--- Phil Steitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Al Chou wrote:
>
> >>Have we considered a design for the general derivative case (i.e. for
> >>UnivariateRealFunction objects)? I was thinking about a
> >>Differentiable interface that either extends from URF or is a base
> >>interface. It would have
--- Phil Steitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Al Chou wrote:
> > --- Phil Steitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >>0. To help debug the SplineInterpolater (PR #28019 et al), I need to
> >>expose the coefficients in o.a.c.m.analysis.Polynomial as a read-only
> >>property (returning an array copy)
Al Chou wrote:
Have we considered a design for the general derivative case (i.e. for
UnivariateRealFunction objects)? I was thinking about a
Differentiable interface that either extends from URF or is a base
interface. It would have a single derivative method with a URF return
value.
Specialized
Al Chou wrote:
--- Phil Steitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
0. To help debug the SplineInterpolater (PR #28019 et al), I need to
expose the coefficients in o.a.c.m.analysis.Polynomial as a read-only
property (returning an array copy). Any objections to adding this?
+1 if you do it by adding a pa
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Mar 2004 21:29:42 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
>
> > 0. To help debug the SplineInterpolater (PR #28019 et al), I need to
> > expose the coefficients in o.a.c.m.analysis.Polynomial as a
> read-only
> > property (returning an array copy). Any objections to a
--- Phil Steitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 0. To help debug the SplineInterpolater (PR #28019 et al), I need to
> expose the coefficients in o.a.c.m.analysis.Polynomial as a read-only
> property (returning an array copy). Any objections to adding this?
+1 if you do it by adding a package-level
On Tue, 30 Mar 2004 21:29:42 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
>
> 0. To help debug the SplineInterpolater (PR #28019 et al), I need to
> expose the coefficients in o.a.c.m.analysis.Polynomial as a
read-only
> property (returning an array copy). Any objections to adding this?
> 1. Add protected stati
0. To help debug the SplineInterpolater (PR #28019 et al), I need to
expose the coefficients in o.a.c.m.analysis.Polynomial as a read-only
property (returning an array copy). Any objections to adding this?
While reviewing the code, I also noticed that the current impl uses
"naive" evaluation (u