On Monday, December 9, 2002, at 10:38 PM, Costin Manolache wrote:
robert burrell donkin wrote:
the reflection code - on the other hand - has proved buggy and unstable.
(the problem is that the reflection code in java 1.3 doesn't work very
well.)
I'm not sure what exactly you have in mind (
robert burrell donkin wrote:
>> We'll not "duplicate" anything - the code to do what we need
>> already exists ( in several forms ), we'll just use it ( adapted
>> to the specific needs ). I don't think it'll be a problem with
>> the duplicated maintainance either - the code we need has been
>> qu
On Sunday, December 8, 2002, at 07:09 AM, Costin Manolache wrote:
We'll not "duplicate" anything - the code to do what we need
already exists ( in several forms ), we'll just use it ( adapted
to the specific needs ). I don't think it'll be a problem with
the duplicated maintainance either - the
It would be reasonably easy to remove the deps of modeler on
digester ( use DOM or SAX directly instead ) and beanutils (
we use only a a very small piece ).
Our use of introspection will not be exposed to the user and
we have some very specific requirements ( as mandated by the spec ),
so there
