Re: [resources] Changing instance variables from protected to private

2005-11-22 Thread Niall Pemberton
On 11/23/05, Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 11/22/05, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On 11/23/05, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On 11/22/05, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > Is there any objection to me changing instan

Re: [resources] Changing instance variables from protected to private

2005-11-22 Thread Martin Cooper
On 11/22/05, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 11/23/05, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 11/22/05, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Is there any objection to me changing instance variables from > "protected" > > > to > > > "private"? > > > >

Re: [resources] Changing instance variables from protected to private

2005-11-22 Thread Niall Pemberton
On 11/23/05, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 11/22/05, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Is there any objection to me changing instance variables from "protected" > > to > > "private"? > > > +1 unless there are already subclasses that access such variables from the

Re: [resources] Changing instance variables from protected to private

2005-11-22 Thread Craig McClanahan
On 11/22/05, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Is there any objection to me changing instance variables from "protected" > to > "private"? +1 unless there are already subclasses that access such variables from their superclass ... in which case we should evaluate whether a getter met

[resources] Changing instance variables from protected to private

2005-11-22 Thread Niall Pemberton
Is there any objection to me changing instance variables from "protected" to "private"? Niall - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]