Re: [transaction][VOTE] Release 1.0 final

2004-12-14 Thread Oliver Zeigermann
germann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Friday, December 10, 2004 1:27 PM > > Subject: [transaction][VOTE] Release 1.0 final > > > > > Dear community, > > > > > > t

Re: [transaction][VOTE] Release 1.0 final

2004-12-13 Thread Johnson Leung Kwai Tat
ot; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 2004 4:36 AM Subject: Re: [transaction][VOTE] Release 1.0 final > Hey, Stephen, > > can I assume your vote is +1 now? > > Oliver > > > On Fri, 10

Re: [transaction][VOTE] Release 1.0 final

2004-12-13 Thread Oliver Zeigermann
-) > > Stephen > > > > - Original Message - > From: "Oliver Zeigermann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Friday, December 10, 2004 1:27 PM > Subject: [transaction][VOTE] Release 1.0 final >

Re: [transaction][VOTE] Release 1.0 final

2004-12-12 Thread Oliver Zeigermann
I understand if you simply have the jar as it often is the case when you deliver something it may be safer to have the files in the jar as well. Sometimes people forget to copy the files along with the jar. That's why I think Stephen's request is reasonable. Oliver On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 14:05:23 -

Re: [transaction][VOTE] Release 1.0 final

2004-12-12 Thread Phil Steitz
-1 . The jar file in the binary needs to contain the LICENSE.txt and NOTICE.txt Then my vote changes to +1 ;-) Is it really required that NOTICE.txt be included in the embedded jars as well as in the enclosing tar? If the distro is a tar, shouldn't the copy in the top level cover the full c

Re: [transaction][VOTE] Release 1.0 final

2004-12-11 Thread Oliver Zeigermann
--- Original Message - > From: "Oliver Zeigermann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Friday, December 10, 2004 1:27 PM > Subject: [transaction][VOTE] Release 1.0 final > > > Dear community, >

Re: [transaction][VOTE] Release 1.0 final

2004-12-10 Thread Oliver Zeigermann
--- Original Message - > From: "Oliver Zeigermann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Friday, December 10, 2004 1:27 PM > Subject: [transaction][VOTE] Release 1.0 final > > > Dear community,

Re: [transaction][VOTE] Release 1.0 final

2004-12-10 Thread Stephen Colebourne
riday, December 10, 2004 1:27 PM Subject: [transaction][VOTE] Release 1.0 final Dear community, the commonts transaction release candidate has been release two weeks ago and has proven to be mature. I would like to see a 1.0 final release now. I have already created the distributions calling &

Re: [transaction][VOTE] Release 1.0 final

2004-12-10 Thread Alex Karasulu
Good work Oliver! +1 Alex - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [transaction][VOTE] Release 1.0 final

2004-12-10 Thread James Mason
Sounds good to me. +1 -James On Fri, 2004-12-10 at 14:27 +0100, Oliver Zeigermann wrote: > Dear community, > > the commonts transaction release candidate has been release two weeks > ago and has proven to be mature. I would like to see a 1.0 final > release now. > > I have already created the

[transaction][VOTE] Release 1.0 final

2004-12-10 Thread Oliver Zeigermann
Dear community, the commonts transaction release candidate has been release two weeks ago and has proven to be mature. I would like to see a 1.0 final release now. I have already created the distributions calling 'ant package'. They are ready for inspection here: http://www.apache.org/~ozeigerman