No idea if there is documentation. Anyway, no hard work for me, just
added them :)
Oliver
On Mon, 10 Jan 2005 08:38:52 -0800, James Mason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It might not be. Is there any definitive documentation anywhere?
>
> -James
>
> On Mon, 2005-01-10 at 11:47 +0100, Oliver Zeiger
It might not be. Is there any definitive documentation anywhere?
-James
On Mon, 2005-01-10 at 11:47 +0100, Oliver Zeigermann wrote:
> OK, thought this was not necessary as the beta won't get mirrored, but
> done anyway.
>
> Oliver
>
>
> On Sun, 09 Jan 2005 20:09:14 -0800, James Mason <[EMAIL P
+1
Daniel
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Im Auftrag von Oliver Zeigermann
> Gesendet: Montag, 10. Januar 2005 02:06
> An: Jakarta Commons Developers List
> Betreff: [transaction][VOTE] Release 1.0.1 *AND* 1.1b
OK, thought this was not necessary as the beta won't get mirrored, but
done anyway.
Oliver
On Sun, 09 Jan 2005 20:09:14 -0800, James Mason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The 1.1b1 files are unsigned. Other than that it all looks good to me.
>
> +1 once the .asc files are uploaded.
>
> -James
>
+1, looks good
Stefan
James Mason wrote:
The 1.1b1 files are unsigned. Other than that it all looks good to me.
+1 once the .asc files are uploaded.
-James
On Mon, 2005-01-10 at 02:06 +0100, Oliver Zeigermann wrote:
Dear community,
as already advertised in this list I would like to see both a 1.0.1
The 1.1b1 files are unsigned. Other than that it all looks good to me.
+1 once the .asc files are uploaded.
-James
On Mon, 2005-01-10 at 02:06 +0100, Oliver Zeigermann wrote:
> Dear community,
>
> as already advertised in this list I would like to see both a 1.0.1
> maintenance release and a fi
Dear community,
as already advertised in this list I would like to see both a 1.0.1
maintenance release and a first beta of a 1.1 feature release
I have already created the distributions calling 'ant package' for
both 1.0.1 and 1.1b1. They are
ready for inspection here:
http://www.apache.org/~oz
