> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Im Auftrag von Brett Porter > Gesendet: Samstag, 27. November 2004 00:28 > An: Jakarta Commons Developers List > Betreff: Re: Migrate to SVN? > > Stephen Colebourne wrote: > > >My main reason is that SVN does not appear to be that widely adopted yet. > A > >sign that the time has come to migrate would be when Eclipse/Idea ships > with > >SVN support built in. > > > IDEA's current EAP cycle has included support OOTB. I haven't tried it > yet though... > > >At the moment, I fear we may just scare off some > >potential users/contributers. > > > > > Good point. How much will this affect commons as a whole? Are there any > particular components that are receiving a lot of user contributions? > I personally think they'll figure it out if we have reasonable SVN > documentation to help them out. > > The reverse is also true. Folks can now get access to SVN behind a > corporate proxy, where with CVS an SSH tunnel is nearly impossible to > attain and pserver only slightly easier. >
Did you manage to work with subclipse behind a proxy? I've had some long discussions with the (big) custumer I'm currently working for so that they changed their proxy setting to let the delta-v stuff going through, but... unfortunately subclipse seems not to support proxies? But if this would work this is a big plus. On the other hand subclipse is not yet as mature as cvs support in eclipse. My working copy gets obscured all the time... confusing. Cheers, Daniel > Cheers, > Brett > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
