Vic,
You should drop the attitude as it provides no benefit to
the discussion.
A simple statement of fact would have been perfectly
acceptable. This issue should have been raised on
the appropriate Geronimo mailing list and not in the
manner it was presented.
-John K
On 10 Nov 2003, at 20:40, Vi
Vic Cekvenich wrote:
> Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> > The Geronimo developers represent that the code
> > contributed for Geronimo does not contain any code
> > belonging to JBoss.
> I just wanted to underline above.
Every Apache Committer represents that they own the right to contribute
their code t
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
The Geronimo developers represent that
the code contributed for Geronimo does not contain any code belonging to
JBoss.
I just wanted to underline above.
.V
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
F
> Interesting that HiveMind was a problem, yet jBoss to Geromino is not a
> potential legal problem for Apache Users. What was the diference, that
> they put the code in sf.net first, refactored packages and claimed it
> was not jBoss IP? All Howard did was level with ASF, and Geronimo
> (insert ap
Vic,
I read the discussions in which you made allegations about Geronimo. Now
please read this:
1/ It is the decision of the Jakarta PMC that as doubt about the ownership
has been expressed and not resolved it is prudent for the PMC to take this
step until it is resolved.
2/ No one is sugges
Interesting that HiveMind was a problem, yet jBoss to Geromino is not a
potential legal problem for Apache Users. What was the diference, that
they put the code in sf.net first, refactored packages and claimed it
was not jBoss IP? All Howard did was level with ASF, and Geronimo
(insert appropri
