Re: OT: Re: was [ANN] hivemind has been temporarily taken offline, NOW: Geronimo code onwership

2003-11-09 Thread Geir Magnusson Jr .
On Sunday, November 9, 2003, at 12:15 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote: Take it to the members list or the Geronimo list. He can't take it to the members list. He's not a Member. Which also means that he's not privy to whatever, if any, discussion occured on that list regarding Geronimo or any othe

RE: OT: Re: was [ANN] hivemind has been temporarily taken offline, NOW: Geronimo code onwership

2003-11-09 Thread Noel J. Bergman
> > Would you please refresh my memory a link the message explaining the > > source of Geronimo source? I think that most people believe, including > > me, that it is refactored jBoss code, how else could so much code > > apear. > Come on, Vic. Take this to the geronimo list if you have accusatio

Re: OT: Re: was [ANN] hivemind has been temporarily taken offline, NOW: Geronimo code onwership

2003-11-09 Thread Geir Magnusson Jr .
On Friday, November 7, 2003, at 05:53 PM, Vic Cekvenich wrote: Danny Angus wrote: 3/ Geronimo is not under the jurisdiction of this PMC. The Geronimo situation was explained to you at the time . Would you please refresh my memory a link the message explaining the source of Geronimo source? I thi

Re: OT: Re: was [ANN] hivemind has been temporarily taken offline, NOW: Geronimo code onwership

2003-11-07 Thread Vic Cekvenich
Danny Angus wrote: 3/ Geronimo is not under the jurisdiction of this PMC. The Geronimo situation was explained to you at the time . Would you please refresh my memory a link the message explaining the source of Geronimo source? I think that most people believe, including me, that it is refactor