RE: [VFS]: Integration - too early?

2004-05-14 Thread Paul Smith
> As far as i understand the community idea - there should be no problem > with this. At least not for me. > Thanks. > >* Is VFS still in a state of flux? > > > > > Well - quite some time not much happened in VFS - i picked it up now and > > try to implement what ever comes in my head. > Howe

Re: [VFS]: Integration - too early?

2004-05-14 Thread Mario Ivankovits
Adam R. B. Jack wrote: Would you want a Bugzilla report on this? Yes - please post everything in bugzilla, that way it cant be lost - and much more important - i could inform you about the progress. Please prefix your summary with [vfs] - so i easily could find it - as a sandbox project it has

Re: [VFS]: Integration - too early?

2004-05-14 Thread Adam R. B. Jack
> >* Is VFS still in a state of flux? > > > > > Well - quite some time not much happened in VFS - i picked it up now and > try to implement what ever comes in my head. Awesome! As a long time user of VFS (first Ruper, now Depot), this is great news. VFS is nicely done, and it'd be a real a shame t

RE: [VFS]: Integration - too early?

2004-05-14 Thread Shapira, Yoav
ROTECTED] >Sent: Friday, May 14, 2004 7:28 AM >To: Jakarta Commons Developers List >Subject: Re: [VFS]: Integration - too early? > >Paul Smith wrote: > >>The certificate that I would signing with would display my >[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>email inside it. Now obviously I woul

Re: [VFS]: Integration - too early?

2004-05-14 Thread Mario Ivankovits
Paul Smith wrote: The certificate that I would signing with would display my [EMAIL PROTECTED] email inside it. Now obviously I wouldn't have written a single line of the commons code, and just wanted to make sure no-one can foresee a problem with that. We'd obviously give appropriate credit wit