Re: [Validator] Unit tests failing

2004-03-29 Thread Martin Cooper
On Mon, 29 Mar 2004, David Graham wrote: > > --- Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Mon, 29 Mar 2004, David Graham wrote: > > > > > > > > --- Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On Mon, 29 Mar 2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -Original Mess

Re: [Validator] Unit tests failing

2004-03-29 Thread Martin Cooper
On Mon, 29 Mar 2004, David Graham wrote: > > --- Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Mon, 29 Mar 2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > > From: Martin Cooper [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > I have a bit of trouble with "supposed to fail". P

RE: [Validator] Unit tests failing

2004-03-29 Thread Shapira, Yoav
RROR] TEST org.apache.commons.validator.EmailTest FAILED Yoav Shapira Millennium Research Informatics >-Original Message- >From: David Graham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Monday, March 29, 2004 2:24 PM >To: Jakarta Commons Developers List >Subject: Re: [Validator] Unit tests faili

Re: [Validator] Unit tests failing

2004-03-29 Thread David Graham
--- Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 29 Mar 2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Martin Cooper [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > I have a bit of trouble with "supposed to fail". Perhaps "currently > > > expected to fail"? ;-) > > > > >

Re: [Validator] Unit tests failing

2004-03-29 Thread Martin Cooper
On Mon, 29 Mar 2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > -Original Message- > > From: Martin Cooper [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > I have a bit of trouble with "supposed to fail". Perhaps "currently > > expected to fail"? ;-) > > > > In any case, I'm not comfortable with rolling a release where

Re: [Validator] Unit tests failing

2004-03-29 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> -Original Message- > From: Martin Cooper [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > I have a bit of trouble with "supposed to fail". Perhaps "currently > expected to fail"? ;-) > > In any case, I'm not comfortable with rolling a release where 'maven clean > dist' fails right out of the box. Can we d

Re: [Validator] Unit tests failing

2004-03-29 Thread Martin Cooper
quot; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Monday, March 29, 2004 5:44 AM > Subject: Re: [Validator] Unit tests failing > > > > On Mon, 29 Mar 2004, Niall Pemberton wrote: > > > > > I thi

Re: [Validator] Unit tests failing

2004-03-29 Thread Martin Cooper
On Mon, 29 Mar 2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > -Original Message- > > --- Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Mon, 29 Mar 2004, Niall Pemberton wrote: > > > > > > > I think its the ExceptionTest which is failing and it looks like it > > > should > > > > from the code. Th

Re: [Validator] Unit tests failing

2004-03-29 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> -Original Message- > --- Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Mon, 29 Mar 2004, Niall Pemberton wrote: > > > > > I think its the ExceptionTest which is failing and it looks like it > > should > > > from the code. There are three tests in ExceptionTest - only one has > > code t

Re: [Validator] Unit tests failing

2004-03-28 Thread Martin Cooper
On Mon, 29 Mar 2004, Niall Pemberton wrote: > I think its the ExceptionTest which is failing and it looks like it should > from the code. There are three tests in ExceptionTest - only one has code to > "pass" the test if it gets the Exception its expecting - the other two are > set to "fail". > >

Re: [Validator] Unit tests failing

2004-03-28 Thread Niall Pemberton
I think its the ExceptionTest which is failing and it looks like it should from the code. There are three tests in ExceptionTest - only one has code to "pass" the test if it gets the Exception its expecting - the other two are set to "fail". The two test which have failures have code to "pass" the