Re: [all] Losing track of threads

2005-12-12 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Boris Unckel wrote: sorry when I haved missed something. Could you please post the URL of that page (again)? I forgot the link sorry :) http://people.apache.org/~ebourg/mozfilter.html Emmanuel Bourg - To unsubscribe, e-mail

Re: [all] Losing track of threads

2005-12-12 Thread Boris Unckel
Hi, > I would say that an efficient filtering is a part of the answer. For > those using Mozilla or Thunderbird I wrote a web page generating the > rules to filter the commons mails. If anyone knows how to turn this into > a Thunderbird extension that would be great. Similar instructions for >

Re: [all] Losing track of threads

2005-12-12 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Stephen Colebourne wrote: However in the short term is there anything we can do? Could we have an area on the wiki where all open release votes have to be recorded? Or is that just another beauracratic step! Basically, my question is what can we do to manage commons better, short of dividing

RE: [all] Losing track of threads

2005-12-11 Thread Tim Roberts
RE: keeping track of votes: I was thinking exactly the same thing. IMO a tool of some kind would be very useful (showing how many people have voted, the open time (possibly reminders), list of raised issues (for people to review before voting). Is there nothing out there to do this? Tim. -Orig

Re: [all] Losing track of threads

2005-12-11 Thread Henri Yandell
On 12/11/05, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, 2005-12-11 at 13:46 +, Stephen Colebourne wrote: > > One thing I've noticed recently is that I've started losing track of > > active threads in commons. This is probably dur to the sheer size of > > commons both in terms of

Re: [all] Losing track of threads

2005-12-11 Thread robert burrell donkin
On Sun, 2005-12-11 at 13:46 +, Stephen Colebourne wrote: > One thing I've noticed recently is that I've started losing track of > active threads in commons. This is probably dur to the sheer size of > commons both in terms of number of components and number of mails. > > This becomes particu