which would throw a
BufferUnderflowException immediately.
-Original Message-
From: Sandy McArthur [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 11, 2005 6:12 PM
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: [collections] BoundedBuffer
On 11/11/05, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I&#
On 11/11/05, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm working on the BoundedBuffer implementation right now. But, I've got a
> question for you folks. What do you think a reasonable default would be for
> the timeout value? Should it wait forever by default (like TimeoutBuffer
> does) or sh
