"Emmanuel Bourg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> getObject() would not really simplify the syntax, i don't think it's
> worth adding this method as it turns
Think of it as a factory method and a method extraction from getObjectList()
Stephane
---
Stephane Bailliez wrote:
imho the multiple lines syntax is cleaner and easier to handle.
I'm ok for this as it is close to what you would do with an xml element.
Though...
There may be an issue with DatabaseConfiguration and JNDIConfiguration
though. This should be solvable for the DatabaseConfig
"Emmanuel Bourg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[...]
> imho the multiple lines syntax is cleaner and easier to handle.
I'm ok for this as it is close to what you would do with an xml element.
Though...
What do you think about a getObjectList(Class primitive, char del
2004 11:27 AM
> To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
> Subject: Re: [configuration] comma delimited properties
>
>
> I agree, i noticed this issue last month and suggested a patch :
>
> http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg
> 33704.html
>
> Basicall
I agree, i noticed this issue last month and suggested a patch :
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg33704.html
Basically it adds a setSplitString(boolean) method in the
AbstractConfiguration class that enable or disable property splitting.
Emmanuel Bourg
Stephane Bailliez wrote:
