RE: [email] rm -r lib/*.jar

2004-11-27 Thread Eric Pugh
thout automation (or lots of attention to detail!). Thanks for the assist.. Eric > -Original Message- > From: Corey Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Saturday, November 27, 2004 8:05 AM > To: Jakarta Commons Developers List; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [email] rm -

Re: [email] rm -r lib/*.jar

2004-11-26 Thread Corey Scott
We appreciate all the help we can get :-) -Corey On Fri, 26 Nov 2004 11:35:04 -0800, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, 26 Nov 2004 11:14:28 +0100, Eric Pugh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > But, it's not really a big deal. It's only a problem for the nightly build > > based

Re: [email] rm -r lib/*.jar

2004-11-26 Thread Craig McClanahan
On Fri, 26 Nov 2004 11:14:28 +0100, Eric Pugh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > But, it's not really a big deal. It's only a problem for the nightly build > based on Ant, and as long as Gump is happy (which it should be as they are > installed as packages) then it doesn't bother me. If the Ant script

Re: [email] rm -r lib/*.jar

2004-11-26 Thread Henri Yandell
Done. On Fri, 26 Nov 2004 11:14:28 +0100, Eric Pugh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It's fine. Can you also do the same trick in > jakarta-commons-sandbox/email/libs as well? As I sent in my email to the > PMC, I thought the reason those jars are not on ibiblio is that you can't > redistribute t

RE: [email] rm -r lib/*.jar

2004-11-26 Thread Eric Pugh
It's fine. Can you also do the same trick in jakarta-commons-sandbox/email/libs as well? As I sent in my email to the PMC, I thought the reason those jars are not on ibiblio is that you can't redistribute them via a website. But having them in CVS would be akin to having them in a war file, co