FileTag is in core which I presume would be released along Jelly...
Or did someone plan to release jelly-core separately ?
paul
Le 21 janv. 05, à 02:38, Hans Gilde a écrit :
I'm for fixing JELLY-177 and JELLY-196 (haven't really looked at 196,
just
the description). 191 is for a TagLib, so it woul
Although, if JellyContext goes out of scope it should have the same effect.
-Original Message-
From: Paul Libbrecht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 21, 2005 3:50 AM
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: [jelly] RC2?
As simple as that
As simple as that:
JellyContext.clear()
To be used, of course, from the same thread that ran the script !
paul
Le 21 janv. 05, à 02:49, Brett Porter a écrit :
If there's a way to tell a context to clean up as it is going out of
scope, that
could definitely be added.
-
t; Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2005 6:12 AM
> To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
> Subject: Re: [jelly] RC2?
>
> Looks good in Maven 1.1 HEAD. Still leaking memory in multiproject
> sites, but I haven't done any recent work to isolate the cause of that.
> JSL remains the s
out Cactus. Will
commit this tonight or tomorrow after a little more testing.
Hans
-Original Message-
From: Paul Libbrecht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2005 3:45 AM
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: [jelly] RC2?
We should maybe make a round o
mmons Developers List
Subject: Re: [jelly] RC2?
Looks good in Maven 1.1 HEAD. Still leaking memory in multiproject
sites, but I haven't done any recent work to isolate the cause of that.
JSL remains the suspect, but nothing solid to back that.
+1 on an RC2 release after standing bugs
Looks good in Maven 1.1 HEAD. Still leaking memory in multiproject
sites, but I haven't done any recent work to isolate the cause of that.
JSL remains the suspect, but nothing solid to back that.
+1 on an RC2 release after standing bugs are fixed.
- Brett
Dion Gillard wrote:
Yep, I'm up for RC2
We should maybe make a round of the bugs submitted, or ?
Hans mentioned he wanted to give a stab at JELLY-177, looks good.
Looks like JELLY-191 and JELLY-196 could be considered...
Any opinion ?
paul
Le 20 janv. 05, à 06:43, Dion Gillard a écrit :
Yep, I'm up for RC2 after some testing and then ass
Yep, I'm up for RC2 after some testing and then assuming no
showstoppers, a 1.0 straight after.
On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 00:32:32 -0500, Hans Gilde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I couldn't fix the problems with my weak ref implementation, so I tweaked
> Paul's fix a little to make it thread safe and be
