Rodney Waldhoff wrote:
I'm strongly opposed to requiring JDK 1.4 at this time in collections or
primitives. I don't use or contribute to lang, but I suggest it's a bad
idea there too.
I agree (strongly). Gary Gregory suggested in a previous [lang][codec]
thread
(http://nagoya.apache.org/eyebrow
mber 08, 2003 19:12
> To: 'Jakarta Commons Developers List'
> Subject: RE: [lang][collections][primitives] etc, JDK compatibility
> query
>
>
> Right. Even I wanted to suggest that it is better to keep off
> 1.4 for a
> while.
>
> I came up with the query
yest night. Maybe
it's
temporary?, or maybe someone forgot??
Ash
> -Original Message-
> From: Paul Libbrecht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, December 08, 2003 19:01
> To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
> Subject: Re: [lang][collections][primitives] et
Rodney Waldhoff wrote:
I'm strongly opposed to requiring JDK 1.4 at this time in collections or
primitives. I don't use or contribute to lang, but I suggest it's a bad
idea there too.
On Mon, 8 Dec 2003, Ash .. wrote:
I wish to know what the compatibility objectives of the forthcoming releases
f
I'm strongly opposed to requiring JDK 1.4 at this time in collections or
primitives. I don't use or contribute to lang, but I suggest it's a bad
idea there too.
On Mon, 8 Dec 2003, Ash .. wrote:
> I wish to know what the compatibility objectives of the forthcoming releases
> for the components l
