Re: The Comprehensive Java Archive Network

2002-04-03 Thread Jon Scott Stevens
on 4/2/02 10:17 PM, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello Jon, > >> I would be completely against putting anything related to >> CJAN on SF.net. >> >> But that is my own very biased opinion. > > May we also know your argumentation for this? > > Cheers, > > Ringo #1. I don'

RE: The Comprehensive Java Archive Network

2002-04-03 Thread Brian Tol
> I would be completely against putting anything related to CJAN on SF.net. > > But that is my own very biased opinion. I don't think we're tied that tightly to SF. It's worked pretty well, but if something better came along, I personally won't mind moving the project. I'd be curious to hear y

RE: The Comprehensive Java Archive Network

2002-04-02 Thread ringo . desmet
Hello Jon, > I would be completely against putting anything related to > CJAN on SF.net. > > But that is my own very biased opinion. May we also know your argumentation for this? Cheers, Ringo -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail:

Re: The Comprehensive Java Archive Network

2002-04-02 Thread Jon Scott Stevens
on 4/2/02 9:03 AM, "Michael Davey - Sun UK Support Engineer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yes. It is my personal hope that the CJAN developers will enhance JJAR such > that it becomes the reference implementation for a CJAN client, with JJAR > continuing to be hosted by Apache, and the server-si

Re: The Comprehensive Java Archive Network

2002-04-02 Thread Henri Yandell
Are there any plans/designs yet for JJAR enhancements? I've been playing with it as an idea for use internall at work and home and am starting to edge towards a list of enhancements I'd like to add. Can I look to add other features for CJAN while I'm making my own ones? My personal aim for JJAR

Re: The Comprehensive Java Archive Network

2002-04-02 Thread Michael Davey - Sun UK Support Engineer
Henri Yandell wrote: > I noticed this yesterday Michael after wondering 'who really does own cjan.org'. > Have you investigated the JJAR component with respect to cjan? Yes. It is my personal hope that the CJAN developers will enhance JJAR such that it becomes the reference implementation f

Re: The Comprehensive Java Archive Network

2002-04-02 Thread Henri Yandell
I noticed this yesterday Michael after wondering 'who really does own cjan.org'. Have you investigated the JJAR component with respect to cjan? [I've joined your mailing list and will attempt to slowly catch up on your docs etc. ] Hen On Tue, 2 Apr 2002, Michael Davey - Sun UK Support Engineer