Re: [all] building the site?

2006-03-01 Thread Paul Libbrecht
Yes, if the parser knows the URL of the parsed bit, it can resolve relative entities... paul Phil Steitz wrote: IIRC, the problem results from the fact that the entity is referenced via a relative path. Moving to a URL or File reference would require either an absolute path or that the resour

Re: [all] building the site?

2006-03-01 Thread Phil Steitz
IIRC, the problem results from the fact that the entity is referenced via a relative path. Moving to a URL or File reference would require either an absolute path or that the resource be loaded from a remote URL, which would make offline builds fail. Could be there is a simple trick to make this

Re: [all] building the site?

2006-02-28 Thread Paul Libbrecht
You wouldn't need to read Xerces in any line... you just need to use an org.xml.sax.InputSource which has a properly set system-id. new InputSource(URL) or new InputSource(File) does make it for you. Generally such resolution error happen to be when an InputSource(InputStream) is used for which

Re: [all] building the site?

2006-02-28 Thread Arnaud HERITIER
Hi Phil, Yes, I'll try to find a solution to use maven 1.1 to build the commons. I'll certainly need to readd xerces to the core :-( to allow you to use XML entities. cheers arnaud On 2/28/06, Phil Steitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Both of these requirements - maven 1.0.2 and xdoc 1.9.

Re: [all] building the site?

2006-02-27 Thread Simon Kitching
Yep, an updated xdoc plugin is required. I struck this with digester and commons-logging. The best solution is to add this dependency to the project's project.xml: maven maven-xdoc-plugin 1.9.2 http://maven.apache.org/maven-1.x/reference/plugins/xdoc/ plugin

Re: [all] building the site?

2006-02-27 Thread Phil Steitz
Both of these requirements - maven 1.0.2 and xdoc 1.9.2 - are included in the "getting and installing maven" section here http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/building.html Thanks in advance, Arnaud for any help removing the 1.0.2 restriction. Phil --

Re: [all] building the site?

2006-02-27 Thread Dion Gillard
Verified. I updated JEXL's documentation so that this doesn't get lost for at least this project. On 2/28/06, Arnaud HERITIER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I hink that you need : > maven 1.0.2 + xdoc 1.9.2 > > Arnaud > > On 2/28/06, Dion Gillard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Arnaud, > > > >

Re: [all] building the site?

2006-02-27 Thread Arnaud HERITIER
I hink that you need : maven 1.0.2 + xdoc 1.9.2 Arnaud On 2/28/06, Dion Gillard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Arnaud, > > if it's a custom xdoc plugin on top of 1.0.2 - which version should I use? > > On 2/28/06, Arnaud HERITIER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Dion, > > > > I think that you nee

Re: [all] building the site?

2006-02-27 Thread Dion Gillard
Arnaud, if it's a custom xdoc plugin on top of 1.0.2 - which version should I use? On 2/28/06, Arnaud HERITIER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Dion, > > I think that you need to upgrade the xdoc plugin. The one bundled in maven > 1.0.2 is too old. I'm trying to have maven 1.1 fully compatible with

Re: [all] building the site?

2006-02-27 Thread Dion Gillard
Ok, so should I use 1.0.2 or 1.1 with commons-site? On 2/28/06, Arnaud HERITIER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Dion, > > I think that you need to upgrade the xdoc plugin. The one bundled in maven > 1.0.2 is too old. I'm trying to have maven 1.1 fully compatible with commons > site > > Arnaud

Re: [all] building the site?

2006-02-27 Thread Arnaud HERITIER
Dion, I think that you need to upgrade the xdoc plugin. The one bundled in maven 1.0.2 is too old. I'm trying to have maven 1.1 fully compatible with commons site Arnaud On 2/28/06, Dion Gillard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Maven 1.0.2 fails for a different reason: > > xdoc:jelly-trans

Re: [all] building the site?

2006-02-27 Thread Dion Gillard
Maven 1.0.2 fails for a different reason: xdoc:jelly-transform: [echo] Generating C:/source/jakarta/jakarta-commons/jexl/target/docs/changelog-report.html from C:\source\jakarta\ja karta-commons\jexl\target\generated-xdocs\changelog-report.xml Could not find the class: org.apache.commons.jelly

Re: [all] building the site?

2006-02-27 Thread Phil Steitz
Brett or someone more knowledgeable can explain in detail why, but you need to either use maven 1.0.2 or get a more tolerant parser to be loaded. Phil On 2/27/06, Dion Gillard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ok, that's what I had, but I still get the following error: > > BUILD FAILED > File.. C:

Re: [all] building the site?

2006-02-27 Thread Dion Gillard
Ok, that's what I had, but I still get the following error: BUILD FAILED File.. C:\Documents and Settings\Dion Gillard\.maven\cache\maven-xdoc-plugin-1.9.2\plugin.jelly Element... x:parse Line.. 471 Column -1 Error on line 18 of document : Relative URI "../../commons-build/menus/menus

Re: [all] building the site?

2006-02-27 Thread Dennis Lundberg
Dion Gillard wrote: I've tried to build the site for JEXL, but obviously have the commons-build directory checked out in the wrong location. Is it documented anywhere what the directory structure must be? You can find it here: http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/building.html#Checking%20out%20th