On Sun, 2005-02-06 at 13:02 -0800, Reid Pinchback wrote:
> --- Simon Kitching <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I stopped using belief as a measurement of code a long time
> > > ago. Usually only works when I wrote all the code. :-)
> > > I'll cook up an experiment and see what I can come up with
--- Simon Kitching <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I stopped using belief as a measurement of code a long time
> > ago. Usually only works when I wrote all the code. :-)
> > I'll cook up an experiment and see what I can come up with
> > in the way of timing information.
>
> That would be excelle
On Sat, 2005-02-05 at 21:02 -0800, Reid Pinchback wrote:
> --- Simon Kitching <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Mucking with (d) is supposed to result in significant
> > > wins when you tune the grammar handling to your app, but I haven't tried
> > > it
> > > myself and I've never seen timing dif
--- Simon Kitching <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-02-03 at 07:52 -0800, Reid Pinchback wrote:
> > Even for Sax the performance difference between (a) and (b) is roughly
> > a factor of 2 across all parsers when processing small (typical
> > message-sized)
> > docs that don't use NS
On Thu, 2005-02-03 at 07:52 -0800, Reid Pinchback wrote:
> --- Simon Kitching <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 2005-02-02 at 20:45 -0800, Reid Pinchback wrote:
> > Of course if someone can demonstrate that non-namespace-aware parsers
> > *are* still useful then I'll change my mind.
>
> J
