On Sun, 24 Aug 2003, robert burrell donkin wrote:
> the usual rule is that sandbox components cannot be released. this has
> worked very well in the past and i'd be very reluctant to see exceptions
> without compelling reasons.
+1. 'Release' to me means that it is a supported release.
However,
Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
> the usual rule is that sandbox components cannot be released. this has
> worked very well in the past and i'd be very reluctant to see exceptions
> without compelling reasons.
I don't think this will be an exception.
> commons-attributes has a nightly build which ar
Leo Sutic wrote:
From: Stephen Colebourne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
As a warning, my concerns would be the speed of passage
through the sandbox. You need to think if you have a
community to maintain this in commons proper, and whether
people have had enough time to review it.
My under
> From: Stephen Colebourne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> As a warning, my concerns would be the speed of passage
> through the sandbox. You need to think if you have a
> community to maintain this in commons proper, and whether
> people have had enough time to review it.
My understanding wa
OK, then I should be set to go...
Thanks!
/LS
> From: Henri Yandell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 21 Aug 2003, Leo Sutic wrote:
> I have moved Avalon Attributes into the Commons Sandbox now, and
> would like to get a release out the door. Just so I understand how
> this is done: If I understand what I've heard/read correctly,
> Sandbox projects aren't released. They have to be accept
I have moved Avalon Attributes into the Commons Sandbox now, and
would like to get a release out the door. Just so I understand how
this is done: If I understand what I've heard/read correctly,
Sandbox projects aren't released. They have to be accepted into
Commons proper first.
Question: Ho
