+1, with the same experience. For >2.0.
Gary
> -Original Message-
> From: Steve Downey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, August 18, 2003 19:46
> To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
> Subject: Re: UUID Reuse proposal
>
> From: "Phil Steitz"
From: "Phil Steitz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, August 18, 2003 3:05 AM
Subject: Re: UUID Reuse proposal
> Sorry, I had forgotten about the existing IdentifierUtils. I would
> suggest that
ce, IMHO again.
> >
> >Gary
> >
> >
> >
> >>-Original Message-
> >>From: Phil Steitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>Sent: Monday, August 18, 2003 00:06
> >>To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
> >>Subject: Re: UUID Reu
rs List
> Subject: Re: UUID Reuse proposal
>
> Tim Reilly wrote:
> > Thanks for the positive response to adapting a UUID class in commons
> lang.
> > [The Axis list has responded with favoring option 2 which is basically
> to
> > not make changes at this time, but h
Tim Reilly wrote:
Thanks for the positive response to adapting a UUID class in commons lang.
[The Axis list has responded with favoring option 2 which is basically to
not make changes at this time, but has no problem with use of the UUID code
from Axis in the commons.]
I'm looking for direction on
Thanks for the positive response to adapting a UUID class in commons lang.
[The Axis list has responded with favoring option 2 which is basically to
not make changes at this time, but has no problem with use of the UUID code
from Axis in the commons.]
I'm looking for direction on next steps - I bel
address.
-Tim
> -Original Message-
> From: Steve Downey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, 16 August 2003 1:30 PM
> To: Jakarta Commons Developers List; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: UUID Reuse proposal
>
>
> That's not good, since your fake MA
ECTED]>
To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, August 15, 2003 10:37 PM
Subject: RE: UUID Reuse proposal
> The Tyrex implementation doesn't attempt to get the
> MAC address from the system, but loads it from a configuration
> file.
> If
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, 16 August 2003 12:26 PM
> To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
> Subject: Re: UUID Reuse proposal
>
>
> I've posted a version of a UUID class previously that meets the random
> number version of the leech spec.
>
> Getting MAC addresses p
Apologies for the triple post, but power just glitched here again, and my
mail hiccuped.
-SMD
- Original Message -
From: "Steve Downey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, August 15, 2003 10:25 PM
>
To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, August 15, 2003 7:11 PM
Subject: RE: UUID Reuse proposal
> Having looked now at both implementations (assuming the axis impl is
what's
> in CVS at
>
http://cvs.
>
To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, August 15, 2003 7:11 PM
Subject: RE: UUID Reuse proposal
> Having looked now at both implementations (assuming the axis impl is
what's
> in CVS at
>
http://cvs.
>
To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, August 15, 2003 7:11 PM
Subject: RE: UUID Reuse proposal
> Having looked now at both implementations (assuming the axis impl is
what's
> in CVS at
>
http://cvs.
and
> should perform better than the Axis impl.
>
> See
>
http://cvs.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/tyrex/tyrex/src/main/tyrex/se
> rvices/UUID.java?rev=1.6
>
> -Tim
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Tim Reilly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
t: Friday, 15 August 2003 11:32 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: UUID Reuse proposal
>
>
> I'd like to ask the axis developers to donate the java package
> org.apache.axis.components.uuid to the Jakarta commons.
>
> I'm cross-posting this mes
ommons Developers List'
>Subject: RE: UUID Reuse proposal
>
>+1.
>
>Another UUID extension I'd like to see and use is a GUID
implementation,
>that's what MS calls a UUID.
>
>WRT to lang.uuid, I am not sure that a new namespace is justified
though.
&
Gary Gregory wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Henri Yandell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 19:27
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: RE: UUID Reuse proposal
Something else to line up for 2.1/3.0?
+1, sounds good.
Gary
I agree. I also agree with Gary
> -Original Message-
> From: Henri Yandell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 19:27
> To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
> Subject: RE: UUID Reuse proposal
>
>
> Something else to line up for 2.1/3.0?
+1, sounds good.
Gary
--
>
>
ed though.
> I'd just put it in .lang like other "basic" types.
>
> gg
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Tim Reilly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 18:32
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > S
-
> From: Tim Reilly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 18:32
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: UUID Reuse proposal
>
> I'd like to ask the axis developers to donate the java package
> org.apache.axis.components.uuid to the Jakart
20 matches
Mail list logo
