mbecke 2004/01/30 11:23:15
Modified:httpclient/src/test/org/apache/commons/httpclient Tag:
HTTPCLIENT_2_0_BRANCH TestNoHost.java
httpclient/src/java/org/apache/commons/httpclient/protocol
Tag: HTTPCLIENT_2_0_BRANCH Protocol.
Michael Becke wrote:
Yes, I think deprecation and calling the first constructor would be better.
Okay, I just changed it. Thanks for the hint, Mike.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMA
oglueck 2003/11/10 06:33:13
Modified:httpclient API_CHANGES_2_1.txt
httpclient/src/java/org/apache/commons/httpclient/protocol
Protocol.java
Log:
re-include old constructor signature for
backwards API compatibility
Revision ChangesPa
That's why it is listed in API changes :-)
Of course we can replace the second constructor with a call to the first
one to be 2.0 API compatible:
Yes, I think deprecation and calling the first constructor would be better.
Mike
Michael Becke wrote:
I think the addition of an instanceof test is good, but I think we
should deprecate here instead of removing the constructor. This
removal causes a binary compatibility problem that I think we can
easily avoid.
Mike
That's why it is listed in API changes :-)
Of cours
I think the addition of an instanceof test is good, but I think we
should deprecate here instead of removing the constructor. This
removal causes a binary compatibility problem that I think we can
easily avoid.
Mike
On Nov 7, 2003, at 2:34 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
oglueck 2003/11/
oglueck 2003/11/06 23:34:34
Modified:httpclient API_CHANGES_2_1.txt
httpclient/src/java/org/apache/commons/httpclient/protocol
Protocol.java
Log:
fixed design error: uniform Protocol constructor for all factories
Revision ChangesPath
