Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
>>> Great. Perfect description. Not disputing the general sentiment (I
>>> still think it's moving deck chairs around if you move every committer
>>> into the PMC).
>>
>> I think it's more about a consistent naming and organization with the
>> rest of apache ( and the
[ damn, I hate reply-to... it totally horks cross-posting... adding
commons-dev back... ]
On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 08:57:57AM -0500, Michael A. Smith wrote:
> Greg Stein wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 27, 2002 at 04:08:02PM -0500, Michael A. Smith wrote:
> >>...
> >>So, to clarify, committers on jakarta-
On Sun, Oct 27, 2002 at 04:08:02PM -0500, Michael A. Smith wrote:
>...
> So, to clarify, committers on jakarta-commons voted for creating a
> management body of the code within the jakarta-commons cvs repository.
> Costin calls this the commons PMC, although the distinction should be
> made that
"Michael A. Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 29/10/2002 01:36:41 AM:
[snip]
> > (but that can also be a signal that something ought to move to
top-level;
> > something like the commons httpclient might be a good candidate for
> > spinning out of J-C and Jakarta altogether... *shrug*)
>
> I'
