Re: transaction] Commons Transaction 1.2 rc3 ready for inspection

2006-09-06 Thread Joerg Heinicke
Oliver Zeigermann gmail.com> writes: > Finally there is the third release candidate at > > http://people.apache.org/~ozeigermann/tx-1.2rc3/ Hi Oliver, just wondering: What happened to the release? Cheers, Jörg - To unsubscr

Re: [transaction] Commons Transaction 1.2 rc3 ready for inspection

2006-08-01 Thread Oliver Zeigermann
2006/7/31, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: On 7/30/06, Oliver Zeigermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 2006/7/30, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > IMO: > > > > * Its straightforward to provide an ant target to download the deps. > > Oh. I am ignorant. Did not know that. How does thi

Re: [transaction] Commons Transaction 1.2 rc3 ready for inspection

2006-07-31 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On 7/31/06, Joerg Heinicke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Rahul Akolkar gmail.com> writes: > > I'm not in favor of distributing deps along with Commons libraries' > distributions. > > * Its straightforward to provide an ant target to download the deps. In contrast to this I prefer to deliver

Re: [transaction] Commons Transaction 1.2 rc3 ready for inspection

2006-07-31 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On 7/30/06, Oliver Zeigermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: 2006/7/30, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > IMO: > > * Its straightforward to provide an ant target to download the deps. Oh. I am ignorant. Did not know that. How does this work? That might be an option. The [scxml] (m1 gene

Re: [transaction] Commons Transaction 1.2 rc3 ready for inspection

2006-07-31 Thread Oliver Zeigermann
2006/7/31, Joerg Heinicke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: On 7/29/06, Oliver Zeigermann gmail.com> wrote: > Finally there is the third release candidate at > http://people.apache.org/~ozeigermann/tx-1.2rc3/ From a functionality POV it works for me. Regarding JDK 1.3 ([1]): How did you solve the problem w

Re: [transaction] Commons Transaction 1.2 rc3 ready for inspection

2006-07-31 Thread Joerg Heinicke
On 7/29/06, Oliver Zeigermann gmail.com> wrote: > Finally there is the third release candidate at > http://people.apache.org/~ozeigermann/tx-1.2rc3/ >From a functionality POV it works for me. Regarding JDK 1.3 ([1]): How did you solve the problem with the J2EE/Geronimo jars? Did you recompile th

Re: [transaction] Commons Transaction 1.2 rc3 ready for inspection

2006-07-30 Thread Oliver Zeigermann
2006/7/30, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: On 7/30/06, Oliver Zeigermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 2006/7/30, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > * Why are the dependencies (the lib folder) included in both distros? > > I'd prefer that they aren't, is there any particular reason why > >

Re: [transaction] Commons Transaction 1.2 rc3 ready for inspection

2006-07-30 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On 7/30/06, Oliver Zeigermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: 2006/7/30, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > * Why are the dependencies (the lib folder) included in both distros? > I'd prefer that they aren't, is there any particular reason why > [transaction] does that? The main build process uses

Re: [transaction] Commons Transaction 1.2 rc3 ready for inspection

2006-07-30 Thread Oliver Zeigermann
2006/7/30, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: * Why are the dependencies (the lib folder) included in both distros? I'd prefer that they aren't, is there any particular reason why [transaction] does that? The main build process uses ant which requires these libraries. * The source distro co

Re: [transaction] Commons Transaction 1.2 rc3 ready for inspection

2006-07-29 Thread Rahul Akolkar
Adjusted subject slightly ... On 7/29/06, Oliver Zeigermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi folks! Finally there is the third release candidate at http://people.apache.org/~ozeigermann/tx-1.2rc3/ Compiled using a 1.3 JDK, and with the proper md5 format. I hope this is ok now. Is it? Sigs,

transaction] Commons Transaction 1.2 rc3 ready for inspection

2006-07-29 Thread Oliver Zeigermann
Hi folks! Finally there is the third release candidate at http://people.apache.org/~ozeigermann/tx-1.2rc3/ Compiled using a 1.3 JDK, and with the proper md5 format. I hope this is ok now. Is it? Oliver - To unsubscribe, e-ma