Re: NullPointerException in HttpMethodBase

2003-06-13 Thread Oleg Kalnichevski
Fix applied. Oleg On Fri, 2003-06-13 at 17:55, Thomas Winkler wrote: > hi, > there is NullPointer in HttpMethodBase.getResponseBody() when > HttpMethodBase.getResponseBodyAsStream() returns null. > > InputStream is = getResponseBodyAsStream(); > byte[] buffer = new byte[4096]; > int len;

Re: NullPointerException in HttpMethodBase

2003-06-13 Thread Oleg Kalnichevski
Good catch, Thomas. I'll get it fixed. Thanks. Oleg On Fri, 2003-06-13 at 17:55, Thomas Winkler wrote: > hi, > there is NullPointer in HttpMethodBase.getResponseBody() when > HttpMethodBase.getResponseBodyAsStream() returns null. > > InputStream is = getResponseBodyAsStream(); > byte[] buff

NullPointerException in HttpMethodBase

2003-06-13 Thread Thomas Winkler
hi, there is NullPointer in HttpMethodBase.getResponseBody() when HttpMethodBase.getResponseBodyAsStream() returns null. InputStream is = getResponseBodyAsStream(); byte[] buffer = new byte[4096]; int len; while ((len = is.read(buffer)) > 0) { os.write(buffer, 0, len); } when nul

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 20744] - HTTPClient MultiPartPostMethod inconsistent behaviour compared to standard form upload

2003-06-13 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE: URI specification - commons sub-project?

2003-06-13 Thread Kalnichevski, Oleg
Sung-Gu, These days Jeff will be spending much, much, much less time on managing HttpClient project. So, I suggest that you take the matter in your own hands. I, Adrian, Mike, and Odi will whole-heartedly support you Oleg -Original Message- From: Sung-Gu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent:

Re: URI specification - commons sub-project?

2003-06-13 Thread Sung-Gu
> - Original Message - > From: "Kalnichevski, Oleg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Hi Sung-Gu, > long time, no see, indeed. :) > Have you spoken with any of the Jakarta Commons management folks regarding > spinning URI support into a Commons sub-project of its own? As I regarded, Jeff Dever

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 20744] - HTTPClient MultiPartPostMethod inconsistent behaviour compared to standard form upload

2003-06-13 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE: URI specification

2003-06-13 Thread Kalnichevski, Oleg
Hi Sung-Gu, long time, no see, indeed. Have you spoken with any of the Jakarta Commons management folks regarding spinning URI support into a Commons sub-project of its own? Oleg - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For

Re: URI specification

2003-06-13 Thread Sung-Gu
Long time no see... ;) - Original Message - From: "Michael Becke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Commons HttpClient Project" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2003 10:25 AM Subject: Re: URI specification > I definitely agree that it would be best if URI had its own home > outside

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 20744] New: - HTTPClient MultiPartPostMethod inconsistent behaviour compared to standard form upload

2003-06-13 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu