Re: NTLM Question

2003-10-22 Thread Roland Weber
Hello Russell, the functionality to retrieve the logon credentials from the operating system is very specific to Windows. On Linux, some projects (Samba client?) implement an extra PAM (Pluggable Authentication Module) to mimic this behavio. It's not good style for the OS itself to remember creden

Re: NTLM Question

2003-10-22 Thread Adrian Sutton
On 23/10/03 2:29 PM, "Thamm, Russell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I am interested in using NTLM for authentication on my Apache based webdav > server. > I am using the Slide client (based on httpclient) > > I understand that HttpClient supports NTLM but requires me to supply the user >

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24012] - Ability to ignore (reject) cookies altogether

2003-10-22 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

NTLM Question

2003-10-22 Thread Thamm, Russell
Hi, I am interested in using NTLM for authentication on my Apache based webdav server. I am using the Slide client (based on httpclient) I understand that HttpClient supports NTLM but requires me to supply the user credentials. I want to obtain the user's logon credentials from the OS and avoid

Re: Java 1.1.8 Status

2003-10-22 Thread Michael Becke
The use of references in the MultiThreadedHttpConnectionManager is not entirely necessary. They are only used to reclaim connections that were not released properly. In general circumstances connection reclaiming should not be needed. Mike On Wednesday, October 22, 2003, at 05:26 PM, Sam

Re: Java 1.1.8 Status

2003-10-22 Thread Sam Berlin
Hi again Oleg, Is the source for the existing 1.1 port available anywhere? I have gone ahead and attempted to port rc2 to Java 1.1 using the com.sun.java.util packages (as that's easiest, and all we really need right now), but a few places use brand new classes/methods. These include NTLM (wh

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 15435] - New Preferences Architecture

2003-10-22 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 15435] - New Preferences Architecture

2003-10-22 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 15435] - New Preferences Architecture

2003-10-22 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Java 1.1.8 Status

2003-10-22 Thread Sam Berlin
Was there any significant overhead in using the 1.1 counterparts? Vector and Hashtable are both synchronized which might be a performance problem if they're used often. I don't know the internals of HttpClient, so I can't say how often they're used. The com.sun classes are no issue for us,

RE: Java 1.1.8 Status

2003-10-22 Thread Kalnichevski, Oleg
Sam, I thought that reliance on com.sun.* classes was a fairly bad idea. So I opted to replace Java 1.2 collection classes with their Java 1.1 counterparts. That can make maintenance of a patch against HEAD or 2.0 branch difficult. I did not add any new methods or classes but I could not resist

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24012] - Ability to ignore (reject) cookies altogether

2003-10-22 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24012] - Ability to ignore (reject) cookies altogether

2003-10-22 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24012] New: - Ability to ignore (reject) cookies altogether

2003-10-22 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Java 1.1.8 Status

2003-10-22 Thread Sam Berlin
Thanks for the reply, Oleg. Was the prior port mainly an exercise in converting java.util.[CollectionClasses] to com.sun.java.util.[CollectionClasses]? If that's the case (and perhaps with a few new methods sprinkled in) maintaining a patch against the head would probably be the best and easi

Re: addRequestHeader doesn't work for "Cookie"?

2003-10-22 Thread Ollie Rutherfurd
Thanks, Oleg! -Ollie Oleg Kalnichevski wrote: Ollie, That was a conscious design decision. Ideally one should be using HttpState#addCoookie method to add cookies to the HTTP state used by HttpClient. Lately, however, quite a few people complained about inability to add 'Cookie' request headers

Re: Slow execution of POST method

2003-10-22 Thread Ortwin Glück
This is bug #17487 http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17487 resolved on 2003-03-06 by Oleg Odi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: then there are pages and pages of the following: [main] DEBUG org.apache.commons.httpclient.HttpConnection - enter HttpConnection.responseAvaliable() -

RE: Slow execution of POST method

2003-10-22 Thread Kalnichevski, Oleg
Carmine, Just for the record, I believe the troublemaker was so called 'expect: 100-continue' handshake. Newer releases of HttpClient do not use the handshake unless explicitly instructed to do so by the user. Apparently the target server (or the proxy server if you use one) has problems with 'e

RE: Slow execution of POST method

2003-10-22 Thread carmine . lucarelli
Thanks for writing that Oleg! Turns out I was using an alpha version of the 2.0. Upgraded to rc2 and all is now well. Should have thought of it myself! Thanks, Carmine "Kalnichevski, Oleg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 10/22/2003 10:02 AM Please respond to "Commons HttpClient Project" To:

RE: Slow execution of POST method

2003-10-22 Thread Kalnichevski, Oleg
What version of HttpClient are you using? Oleg -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2003 15:58 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Slow execution of POST method Hello all. Let me know if this isn't the list to ask this. I'm using

Slow execution of POST method

2003-10-22 Thread carmine . lucarelli
Hello all. Let me know if this isn't the list to ask this. I'm using httpclient to execute a POST request to our mainframe CICS region. The request takes 3 to 4 seconds to complete through httpclient and less then one second via a web page and browser. When I look at the log files, I see this:

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23988] - Updates to connectionStaleCheckingEnabled docs.

2003-10-22 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE: Outstanding patches?

2003-10-22 Thread Kalnichevski, Oleg
Mike, Not yet. I am planning to submit the revised new preference architecture patch tonight, so there'll be something to look at. Cheers Oleg -Original Message- From: Michael Becke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2003 04:27 To: Commons Project Subject: Outstandin