Re: proxy authentication

2004-05-09 Thread Michael Becke
Hi lili, It sounds like an internal problem with the proxy server, but it's difficult to tell. If you post a wire log we should be able to get a better idea of what's happening. Mike On May 9, 2004, at 7:30 PM, Lili Liu wrote: My p

proxy authentication

2004-05-09 Thread Lili Liu
My proxy authentication code (basic host) works well unless I ran it on a special IP address. The internet traffic on this special IP has to go through a proxy server (The same proxy I used in the code). In another word, if I access internet using a browser, I have to specify a valid proxy server.

Re: A few remaining issues to be discussed before we cut 3.0a1

2004-05-09 Thread Michael Becke
(1) Since this release is going to be incompatible with 2.0 API anyways, I suggest HttpException be changed to derive from Exception and not IOException. The only reason for not making a clear distinction between protocol exceptions (derived from HttpException) and transport exceptions (derived fr

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28645] - Move Content-Type to the RequestEntity

2004-05-09 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 20288] - httpMethod.abort needed

2004-05-09 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28645] - Move Content-Type to the RequestEntity

2004-05-09 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

A few remaining issues to be discussed before we cut 3.0a1

2004-05-09 Thread Oleg Kalnichevski
Folks, We are basically two bug reports away from the target for the 3.0a1 release. We are damn close. Before we cut the release, I feel there is a few issues to be discussed first. (1) Since this release is going to be incompatible with 2.0 API anyways, I suggest HttpException be changed to deriv

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28645] - Move Content-Type to the RequestEntity

2004-05-09 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 20288] - httpMethod.abort needed

2004-05-09 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 20288] - httpMethod.abort needed

2004-05-09 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 20288] - httpMethod.abort needed

2004-05-09 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 20288] - httpMethod.abort needed

2004-05-09 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 20288] - httpMethod.abort needed

2004-05-09 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Problems with HttpClient

2004-05-09 Thread Oleg Kalnichevski
Anoop, My guess is that some of the methods simply timeout while reading the response from the server. Unfortunately, HttpClient does not handle this situation well. Do not use HttpMethodBase#getResponseBody or HttpMethodBase#getResponseBodyAsString methods. They are plain broken. Both methods are

Problems with HttpClient

2004-05-09 Thread Anoop Adya
Hi We have developed a client solution with the help of HttpClient. During the trial run we noticed that it works smoothly for clients and server within the same domain. However, if i try to use HttpClient over multiple domains, I get a NullPointerException as getResponseBody returns null. Do we ne

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 16124] - isHttp11 should have HttpClient scope

2004-05-09 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu