How to use two distinct HttpClients on the same web site

2004-08-25 Thread Fabien BALAGEAS
Hi, I am using HttpClient 2.0.1. I would like to have two HttpClient connections to the same web site in my application, but from two "distinct" HttpClient (i.e. each connection should handle its self cookies). How can i realize this task ? Up to now, i only managed to have two connections

Re: URI.parseAuthority throws URIException: invalid port number when using login with at-sign

2004-08-25 Thread Ortwin Glück
Rudolf, this is indee tricky. We had a similar bug here regarding the # character. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28728 Does this help? Ortwin Glück Rudolf Kaertner wrote: Is this a well known behaviour or is this to be considered as a bug? The at-sign ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is i

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 17416] - Send InputStreams instead of files in MultipartPostMethod

2004-08-25 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10793] - User definable default headers support

2004-08-25 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30834] - MultipartPost string part without defaults

2004-08-25 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30834] - MultipartPost string part without defaults

2004-08-25 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30834] - MultipartPost string part without defaults

2004-08-25 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE: HttpRecoverableException

2004-08-25 Thread Labajo, Dennis
Hi Oleg, Thank you for the info. I'll try this one out and will let you know. Thanks a bunch. Dennis -Original Message- From: Oleg Kalnichevski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2004 8:47 AM To: Commons HttpClient Project Subject: RE: HttpRecoverableException Hi

Re: HttpClient and Java.nio?

2004-08-25 Thread Oleg Kalnichevski
Andre I have been working with the NIO quite extensively for the last few months. Here's my take on the problem. I believe as of HttpClient 4.0 we should no longer maintain 1.2 (actually HttpClient is still fully jre 1.2 compatible) compatibility. That would enable us to leverage some of NIO feat

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30834] - MultipartPost string part without defaults

2004-08-25 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE: HttpRecoverableException

2004-08-25 Thread Oleg Kalnichevski
Hi Dennis, > 2004/08/19 11:56:07:490 CDT [WARN] MainMenu - -Web Service Exception: > > he.commons.httpclient.HttpRecoverableException: Error in parsing the > > status line from the response: unable to find line starting with "HTTP" Usually this happens when the web servers being under heavy loa

URI.parseAuthority throws URIException: invalid port number when using login with at-sign

2004-08-25 Thread Rudolf Kaertner
Is this a well known behaviour or is this to be considered as a bug? The at-sign ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is internally used as field separator for the port-number, so that when using a login like [EMAIL PROTECTED] for authentication will lead to this exception, as “domain” is an invalid port numb