RE: [VOTE] 3.0 alpha 2 release

2004-09-17 Thread Gerdes, Tom
-Original Message- From: Michael Becke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2004 9:12 PM To: Commons HttpClient Project Subject: [VOTE] 3.0 alpha 2 release It looks like we're ready for a 3.0 alpha 2 release. Please vote as follows:

[PATCH] Do not auto-retry methods failed due to a timeout or an SSL handshake error

2004-09-17 Thread Oleg Kalnichevski
Folks, Here's a small patch that tweaks the default method retry handler a little. Currently HttpClient 3.0 stubbornly reties method that fail due to a timeout or an SSL handshake exception, which is not the way it probably should be. Unless I hear loud complaints, I'll apply the patch tonight at

Re: 2.0 Webapp tests failing

2004-09-17 Thread Ortwin Glück
All right Oleg, I was using Tomcat 4.1.30 with o.a.coyote.tomcat4.CoyoteConnector for my tests. I understand that the webapp testing must be replaced. No worries. My fault to (again) stumble at this issue. Enjoy a hopfully rainless day... Odi Oleg Kalnichevski wrote: All right, do not be hard on

Re: 2.0 Webapp tests failing

2004-09-17 Thread Oleg Kalnichevski
On Fri, 2004-09-17 at 10:02, Ortwin GlÃck wrote: > Oleg Kalnichevski wrote: > > > Odi, > > > > Which branch: HEAD or 2.0? > > > > Oleg > > 2.0 as subject suggests. > All right, do not be hard on the old man. Odi, I assume you recently upgraded the version of Tomcat that hosts the test webapp? ;-

Re: 2.0 Webapp tests failing

2004-09-17 Thread Ortwin Glück
Oleg Kalnichevski wrote: Odi, Which branch: HEAD or 2.0? Oleg 2.0 as subject suggests. Odi -- _ NOSE applied intelligence ag ortwin glÃck [www] http://www.nose.ch software engineer hardturmstrasse 171

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31246] - JVM bug 4949631 causes BufferOverflowException in HttpMethodBase.getResponseBodyAsString

2004-09-17 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: 2.0 Webapp tests failing

2004-09-17 Thread Oleg Kalnichevski
On Fri, 2004-09-17 at 09:49, Ortwin GlÃck wrote: > Some of the Cookie tests are currently failing. Can some Cookie expert > have a look into this? > Odi, Which branch: HEAD or 2.0? Oleg > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL P

2.0 Webapp tests failing

2004-09-17 Thread Ortwin Glück
Some of the Cookie tests are currently failing. Can some Cookie expert have a look into this? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: [VOTE] 3.0 alpha 2 release

2004-09-17 Thread Ramesh Nethi
Hi, Sorry about that. My outlook mailing list account didn't have the name configured. Fixed it. My name is Ramesh Nethi. I am part of the team that runs a web page tracking service at www.infominder.com We are looking at using HttpClient 3.0 for some of the features we are planning for the futur