DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10805] - UnderscoreIsDash http workaround

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10805] - UnderscoreIsDash http workaround

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10805] - UnderscoreIsDash http workaround

Kalnichevski, Oleg wrote: Odi, My theory is that there may be (or Jeff thought there might be) a requirement in the HTTP spec somewhere that underscore character may be used instead of dash wherever dash is considered a valid character, but I can't find that requirement in RFC2616. I guess we shoul

RE: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10805] - UnderscoreIsDash http workaround

eport as invalid. Oleg -Original Message- From: Ortwin Glück [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 21, 2003 9:25 AM To: Commons HttpClient Project Subject: Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10805] - UnderscoreIsDash http workaround Looking at the comments, I don't get what this bug is a

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10805] - UnderscoreIsDash http workaround

Looking at the comments, I don't get what this bug is about. It's been floating around for some time now, and nobody seems to care. Jef, you seem to know. Why did you file this bug? What's the idea behind it? Can we delete this bug? Odi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10805] - UnderscoreIsDash http workaround

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu