Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 11190] - need getResponseContentLengthin HttpMethod

2003-03-11 Thread Jeffrey Dever
okbyme Kalnichevski, Oleg wrote: Jeff, any objections to committing this patch? Shall we wait for me feedback? Let me know what you think Oleg -Original Message- From: Jeffrey Dever [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Dienstag, 11. März 2003 18:09 To: Commons HttpClient Project Subject: Re:

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 11190] - need getResponseContentLengthin HttpMethod

2003-03-11 Thread Jeffrey Dever
Let me reconsider that. I had assumed that the requester needed access to the content length in client code. If so they can just get this from the header anyway. The actual content length is another matter which you are right to make protected in HttpMethodBase. Kalnichevski, Oleg wrote: Ja

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 11190] - need getResponseContentLengthin HttpMethod

2003-03-11 Thread Jeffrey Dever
The patch adds getResponseContentLength to HttpMethodBase, which is good, but it should also go into the HttpMethod interface. I think that this is a "safe" change at this point. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INT