Re: HttpClient performance

2004-08-20 Thread Oleg Kalnichevski
not remember which earlier releases I used. I only remeber that > it > > did not have the rcX attached to it. I am not sure if it matters now. > I > > guess, the only thing we are concerned here is whether we can get > > HttpClient performance better than JDK or not. If

Re: HttpClient performance

2004-08-20 Thread Zulfi Umrani
er that it > did not have the rcX attached to it. I am not sure if it matters now. I > guess, the only thing we are concerned here is whether we can get > HttpClient performance better than JDK or not. If yes, then how do we > get it? I guess some other folks had a similar problem before. Wonde

Re: HttpClient performance

2004-08-20 Thread Oleg Kalnichevski
> I do not remember which earlier releases I used. I only remeber that it > did not have the rcX attached to it. I am not sure if it matters now. I > guess, the only thing we are concerned here is whether we can get > HttpClient performance better than JDK or not. If yes, then how do

HttpClient performance

2004-08-20 Thread Zulfi Umrani
Hi, Just wondering what were the results you got from your tests. I did not find the results on the email archive, may be because I was not subscribed. Thanks, Zulfi Ortwin Glück wrote Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2004 10:06:41 +0200 From: Ortwin Glück <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: HttpClient perfo

HttpClient performance

2004-08-20 Thread Zulfi Umrani
ng we are concerned here is whether we can get HttpClient performance better than JDK or not. If yes, then how do we get it? I guess some other folks had a similar problem before. Wondering if a solution to the problem was found or not? Hope this helps you in understanding the problem. -

Re: HttpClient performance (with download URL)

2004-08-20 Thread Ortwin Glück
Zulfi, I ran the profiler on HttpClient 2.0-alpha3 and HttpClient 2.0 Branch latest CVS I basically used Oleg's test case provided in the email thread you mentioned (code included). I turned off logging and stale connection checking. I ran the tests against a local Tomcat on a Win2k Pro workstation

Re: HttpClient performance

2004-08-20 Thread Ortwin Glück
Zulfi, I ran the profiler on HttpClient 2.0-alpha3 and HttpClient 2.0 Branch latest CVS I basically used Oleg's test case provided in the email thread you mentioned (code included). I turned off logging and stale connection checking. I ran the tests against a local Tomcat on a Win2k Pro workstati

RE: HttpClient performance

2004-08-20 Thread Kalnichevski, Oleg
onnection Oleg -Original Message- From: Zulfi Umrani [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 20, 2004 7:06 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: HttpClient performance Hi, Just wanted to get the latest information on the performance issues reported earlier. I have gone through the below emails fr

HttpClient performance

2004-08-19 Thread Zulfi Umrani
Hi, Just wanted to get the latest information on the performance issues reported earlier. I have gone through the below emails from Archive, but could not get a definite solution to the performance problem. Wondering whether a definite solution was found and whether there is a patch available. We