fficial' HttpClient
branches.
Oleg
-Original Message-
From: Roland Weber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 12:00 PM
To: Commons HttpClient Project
Subject: Re: JDK 1.1.8 problems
Maybe maintain a patch for the required source modifications?
Roland
Maybe maintain a patch for the required source modifications?
Roland
Michael Becke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
23.09.2003 23:39
Please respond to "Commons HttpClient Project"
To: Commons HttpClient Project
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc:
Subject:
Oleg Kalnichevski wrote:
It took me just a few hours, but I have to say I know quite a bit about
HttpClient's internals.
Well, I hope so:)
This year release is going to be the last one with JRE 1.1 support as
far as my application is concerned. I doubt I would actively maintain
the port myself. U
gt;
> >><[EMAIL PROTECTED]To: "Commons HttpClient Project"
> >>
> >>point.com><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
&g
08/14/2003 10:45 AM Subject: RE: JDK 1.1.8 problems
Please respond to "Commons
> point.com><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> cc:
>
>
David,
HttpClient requires Java 2 compatible JRE (> 1.2.x), primarily because
it uses Java 2 collections framework. We have never aimed at providing
Java 1.1 compatibility.
Oleg
On Wed, 2003-08-13 at 22:47, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I have upgraded from
>
> commons-httpclient-2.0-alpha2 to c
TECTED]>
.org>cc:
Subject: Re: JDK 1.1.8 problems
cc:
Subject: Re: JDK 1.1.8 problems
08/13/2003
hance to bring it up to date
Oleg
-Original Message-
From: Ortwin Glück [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 5:37 PM
To: Commons HttpClient Project
Subject: Re: JDK 1.1.8 problems
Oleg,
just an idea: maybe you can open a sourceforge.net project with the
1.1.8 versi
Subject: Re: JDK 1.1.8 problems
08/13/2003
I have upgraded from
commons-httpclient-2.0-alpha2 to commons-httpclient-2.0-rc1 and am now
having problems in HttpConnection
2003-08-13 17:10:26,233 ERROR: java.net.Socket: method getSendBufferSize()I
not found
java.lang.NoSuchMethodError: java.net.Socket: method getSendBufferSize()I
not found
Oleg,
just an idea: maybe you can open a sourceforge.net project with the
1.1.8 version of HttpClient and share it with David. Should be
compatible with the Apache License but still distinguish it from the
'official' build.
Odi
Kalnichevski, Oleg wrote:
If you are able to sleep comfortably h
> cc:
>
> 08/14/2003 10:45 AM Subject: RE: JDK 1.1.8
> probl
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc:
08/14/2003 10:45 AM Subject: RE: JDK 1.1.8
problems
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc:
08/14/2003 Subject: Re: JDK 1.1.8 problems
2003 6:11 PM
To: Commons HttpClient Project
Subject: Re: JDK 1.1.8 problems
I just attempted to compile current 2.0 snapshot of HttpClient with JDK
1.1.8 and ended up with over 300 error messages
Oleg
On Wed, 2003-08-13 at 23:03, Michael Becke wrote:
> It is by no means the only line of co
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > .org>cc:
> >
> > Subject: Re: JDK 1.1.8 problems
> >
> >
gt;
> .org>cc:
>
> Subject: Re: JDK 1.1.8 problems
If you are able to sleep comfortably having shipped such a library to your clients,
good for you. I am not. Facing similar dilemma a year ago I ended up forking
HttpClient.
Oleg
Well I don't agree with that. I was able to remove all calls to setBuffer
and getBuffer and now have it up and worki
George Gastaldi wrote:
I don't think it would be a good idea to scramble HTTPClient's code with
checks for < 1.2 versions.
IMHO, the main requirement for HTTPClient MUST be Java 1.2 and above.
George
Yep. Totally agreed. If your application needs to do complex HTTP stuff,
then it is too complex fo
21 matches
Mail list logo
