43
M 847-863-7045
> -Original Message-
> From: Jeffrey Dever [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, February 03, 2003 2:28 PM
> To: O'brien, Tim
> Cc: 'Commons HttpClient Project'
> Subject: Re: Moving Base64 in HttpClient to commons-codec
>
>
PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Moving Base64 in HttpClient to commons-codec
I saw that bug report and made Tim aware that xml-rpc also had an
implementation. They all appear to be based on the same one that was
forked and diverged over time.
All I'm asking for is one authoritive place in common
I saw that bug report and made Tim aware that xml-rpc also had an
implementation. They all appear to be based on the same one that was
forked and diverged over time.
All I'm asking for is one authoritive place in commons to get Base64
functionality. Any fixes that have gone into the forked
Hi Jandalf,
I am not currently subscribed to Commons Dev, although I imagine I need
to resubscribe sometime soon.
Martin Redington just checked HttpClient's version of Base64.java, and
it still has the problems in Bug 9931. We have also made some
performance improvements as you will see in th
There is a vote on the commons-dev list to use the Base64 encoder from
HttpClient in the commons-codec package. If that passes we should
discuss using the the new package and deprecating/removing the fork in
HttpClient.
I think that this would be good for code reuse and for commons. If you
