Oliver Köll wrote:
I only have a minor feature request for the preferences architecture: it
would be nice to be able to define default HttpMethodParams per
HttpClient instance. (i'm not sure, but you may already have taken care
of that).
Actually that was one of the design goals of the new pref
ommons HttpClient Project
> Subject: Re: HttpClient 3.0 is kind of done. Feedback needed
>
> > Another evil plan that I have been contemplating recently is to address
> > our fellow open-source developers that are known to be using HttpClient
> > (read: shamelessly spam the
Another evil plan that I have been contemplating recently is to address
our fellow open-source developers that are known to be using HttpClient
(read: shamelessly spam the dev mailing lists) and ask them what they
think of the new 3.0 API and whether they have any migration plans. If
needed I am pr
No worries. The preferences API can be tricky. As soon as 3.0a2 is
officially out, there will be a new guide dealing exclusively with the
preferences API. Meanwhile you can get it from the CVS (as always)
Oleg
On Thu, 2004-09-16 at 18:16, Oliver KÃll wrote:
> Hi Oleg,
>
> thanks for the tips - i
Hi Oleg,
thanks for the tips - i'll check them out.
They look rather obvious, too - i wonder why i didn't think of it :-(
I think the preferences stuff is a little hard to figure out. I usually
end up scanning through the sources being quite confused. OTH, when i DO
grasp something, it looks rat
On Thu, 2004-09-16 at 16:00, Oliver KÃll wrote:
> Oleg Kalnichevski wrote:
> >
> > Anyways, before things turn ugly, give us some feedback, pleeese
>
> Hi Oleg,
>
> i'm sorry, that i haven't given any feedback earlier, but i always felt,
>that my understanding of HttpClient wasn't deep
Thanks! Ortwin, that helps to know what changes have been made!
-Original Message-
From: Ortwin Glück [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2004 8:55 AM
To: Commons HttpClient Project
Subject: Re: HttpClient 3.0 is kind of done. Feedback needed
Gerdes, Tom wrote
Oleg Kalnichevski wrote:
Anyways, before things turn ugly, give us some feedback, pleeese
Hi Oleg,
i'm sorry, that i haven't given any feedback earlier, but i always felt,
that my understanding of HttpClient wasn't deep enough to qualify any
criticism.
The good news: i'm already using
Gerdes, Tom wrote:
What is the web site...
I guess we should upload a copy of the 3.0 website and place a link to it.
Users can create the website by checking out the CVS and run Maven 1.0:
maven site:generate
You will then find the Site under target/docs/index.htm
Odi
--
__
erdes, Tom wrote:
> What is the web site... And what are the improvements?
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Michael Becke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2004 7:27 AM
> To: Commons HttpClient Project
> Subject: Re: HttpClient 3.0 is kind of don
What is the web site... And what are the improvements?
-Original Message-
From: Michael Becke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2004 7:27 AM
To: Commons HttpClient Project
Subject: Re: HttpClient 3.0 is kind of done. Feedback needed
I agree. I think we're
The 3.0-alpha2 release should certainly be the first step. I would even
go so far as to announce this release be the last ALPHA release.
More visibility is definitely a must. I think we could even make use of
our new Jakarta subproject status and temporarily deploy the site
generated off the CVS
I agree. I think we're ready for another 3.0 release.
There has been surprisingly little comment on the 3.0 API, and I'm also
concerned about freezing it until we've had more feedback. We
definitely have a "chicken and the egg" problem here. My preference is
to continue with a new 3.0 alph
13 matches
Mail list logo
