: Friday, June 13, 2003 16:14
To: Commons HttpClient Project
Subject: Re: URI specification - commons sub-project?
> - Original Message -
> From: "Kalnichevski, Oleg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Hi Sung-Gu,
> long time, no see, indeed.
:)
> Have you spok
> - Original Message -
> From: "Kalnichevski, Oleg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Hi Sung-Gu,
> long time, no see, indeed.
:)
> Have you spoken with any of the Jakarta Commons management folks regarding
> spinning URI support into a Commons sub-project of its own?
As I regarded, Jeff Dever
Hi Sung-Gu,
long time, no see, indeed.
Have you spoken with any of the Jakarta Commons management folks regarding spinning
URI support into a Commons sub-project of its own?
Oleg
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For
Long time no see... ;)
- Original Message -
From: "Michael Becke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Commons HttpClient Project" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2003 10:25 AM
Subject: Re: URI specification
> I definitely agree that it would be best
Mike,
I think you should give it another shot and file a proposal for URI
classes to be moved into Commons sandbox project of its own. I do not
think of deprecation of URI classes as a big issue. We may continue
supporting our own copy of URI classes while commons-uri is the sandbox.
I really think
I definitely agree that it would be best if URI had its own home
outside of HttpClient. My impression was that we would try to have it
removed by 2.1 but I see that it is not deprecated. Perhaps that is
due to the luke warm reception it has received from the commons
community at large. I agr
