On Sat, 2010-01-02 at 12:27 +, Neil Jerram wrote:
> 2010/1/2 William Kenworthy :
> >
> > Just a couple of thoughts - missing calls is rarely to do with volume
> > and not hearing the ring (I have changed the standard tones though), and
> > more to do with crashes.
>
> Ah, OK, I didn't realise
2010/1/2 William Kenworthy :
>
> Just a couple of thoughts - missing calls is rarely to do with volume
> and not hearing the ring (I have changed the standard tones though), and
> more to do with crashes.
Ah, OK, I didn't realise that. (I don't yet get enough incoming
mobile calls to have a signi
On Sat, 2010-01-02 at 01:24 +, Neil Jerram wrote:
> In the survey thread, a couple of responses mentioned missing calls
> because of ringtone problems - which I take to be either volume too
> low, or too much latency, or both. Here are some thoughts on that.
>
> 1) In case this isn't already
In the survey thread, a couple of responses mentioned missing calls
because of ringtone problems - which I take to be either volume too
low, or too much latency, or both. Here are some thoughts on that.
1) In case this isn't already well known... FSO actually does nothing
at all with the "volume
4 matches
Mail list logo