[Compiz] [Bug 877438] Re: Unity/compiz has sluggish performance on dual-head with nvidia driver

2012-01-30 Thread Michael Knap
AndreK, what you describe seems like bug 888039. You might want to have a peek over on that thread. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of compiz packagers, which is subscribed to compiz in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/877438 Title: Unity/compiz has sluggi

[Compiz] [Bug 770160] Re: windows start to move slow after using compiz for some hours

2012-01-30 Thread Michael Knap
I would be tempted to mark this as a duplicate of bug 888039 which was fixed over the weekend. If you are interested, you can follow the thread on that bug and test the fix. It seems to be working for me. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of compiz packagers, which is

Re: [Compiz] [Bug 888039] Re: Gradual degradation in desktop performance.

2012-01-29 Thread Michael Knap
Sorry about the text in the post. I wanted to give you guys something better, so I ran perf record for a a few seconds. I then perf report >> perf_report. The report is attached. It might be easier to read. Michael Knap http://michaelknap.net Instructor and Researcher Mathematics and Co

Re: [Compiz] [Bug 888039] Re: Gradual degradation in desktop performance.

2012-01-29 Thread Michael Knap
cess_iterator_tag) libnux-graphics-1.0.so.0.1600.0 Thank you for all input and work ! Michael Knap http://michaelknap.net Instructor and Researcher Mathematics and Controls Engineering Center of Excellence in Information Systems Tennessee State University On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 9:34 PM, Da

Re: [Compiz] [Bug 888039] Re: Gradual degradation in desktop performance.

2012-01-29 Thread Michael Knap
Yeah... I feel like this is a start. I was hoping to stir the waters a little bit here. Eagerly awaiting a fix. Shouldn't this bug at least be triaged soon ! This is a good lead with data. I will do what I can to provide more data if someone just tells me what they need . On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at

Re: [Compiz] [Bug 888039] Re: Gradual degradation in desktop performance.

2012-01-29 Thread Michael Knap
5.00 0.1% _nv012250rm [nvidia] On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 10:25 AM, Michael Knap wrote: > I have installed perf, and am gathering some data. I am afraid my data > may be slightly skewed, though, as I am seeing nvidia stuff topping > the list of performance hogs. But, I thought that someone

Re: [Compiz] [Bug 888039] Re: Gradual degradation in desktop performance.

2012-01-29 Thread Michael Knap
I have installed perf, and am gathering some data. I am afraid my data may be slightly skewed, though, as I am seeing nvidia stuff topping the list of performance hogs. But, I thought that someone above had commented that they see the same bug even without nvidia hardware. I have a couple of machin

Re: [Compiz] [Bug 888039] Re: Gradual degradation in desktop performance.

2012-01-29 Thread Michael Knap
Thank you again, Daniel. I will see what I can do to gather some data. I have already checked on pstack. Ubuntu packages a version but only for i386; alas, I am running x86_64. I may be able to setup a machine at work as a testbed, though. On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 11:51 PM, Daniel van Vugt wrote

Re: [Compiz] [Bug 888039] Re: Gradual degradation in desktop performance.

2012-01-28 Thread Michael Knap
Thank you Daniel, I am installing valgrind now. I have used a profiler for another language. I 'll see what I can learn with google and man. On the other hand, if I am attached to the running compiz with gdb, is there a way to state the currently running function ? I would still like to test my i

Re: [Compiz] [Bug 888039] Re: Gradual degradation in desktop performance.

2012-01-27 Thread Michael Knap
Chauncellor, are you running Twinview by any chance ? Michael Knap http://michaelknap.net Instructor and Researcher Mathematics and Controls Engineering Center of Excellence in Information Systems Tennessee State University On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 10:12 PM, Chauncellor <

[Compiz] [Bug 888039] Re: Gradual degradation in desktop performance.

2012-01-27 Thread Michael Knap
I should add that if I shutdown my Natty box, reboot into the Oneiric partition, then I get the same previous results: a linearly increasing CPU usage with compiz. So, it is not machine-dependent. Finally, on an Oneiric install with the same nvidia hardware, but not running TwinView, I have not se

[Compiz] [Bug 888039] Re: Gradual degradation in desktop performance.

2012-01-27 Thread Michael Knap
I was trying to add two sets of data to my last post. Here is the other one. Please note the titles in the plots. What I would like to learn to do if a developer could point me in that direction is attach to the compiz process, and actually try to see what is process in compiz is eating the CPU. I

[Compiz] [Bug 888039] Re: Gradual degradation in desktop performance.

2012-01-27 Thread Michael Knap
I just wanted to chime in here. I've been searching for this bug on Launchpad for some time ! There are so many compiz / unity bugs, there seems to be a lot of noise on each bug report with intersecting symptoms. This makes it so hard to really identify and isolate a particular bug ! Anyway, I want

[Compiz] [Bug 301174] Re: Use proper sound event instead of system beep

2010-02-04 Thread Michael Knap
I have no idea how I had access to change the status of this bug ! I couldn't change it back to triaged, so I just changed the status to In Progress. Myself, I am still trying to get compiz to sound the nice bell that metacity does on a beep. ** Changed in: compiz (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Rel

[Compiz] [Bug 301174] Re: Use proper sound event instead of system beep

2010-02-04 Thread Michael Knap
** Changed in: compiz (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Fix Released -- Use proper sound event instead of system beep https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/301174 You received this bug notification because you are a member of compiz packagers, which is subscribed to compiz in ubuntu.