Re: [Cooker] New rpmdrake

2003-01-21 Thread Guy.Bormann
On 20 Jan 2003, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote: > Benjamin Pflugmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On Tue 2003-01-14 at 05:31:22 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > --- Chris Picton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > [...] > > > > I feel that the radio buttons 'Normal information', and 'Maximum > >

Re: [Cooker] New rpmdrake

2003-01-20 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau
Benjamin Pflugmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Tue 2003-01-14 at 05:31:22 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > --- Chris Picton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [...] > > > I feel that the radio buttons 'Normal information', and 'Maximum > > > information' should be replaced with three notebook ta

Re: [Cooker] New rpmdrake

2003-01-15 Thread Benjamin Pflugmann
On Tue 2003-01-14 at 05:31:22 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > --- Chris Picton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...] > > I feel that the radio buttons 'Normal information', and 'Maximum > > information' should be replaced with three notebook tabs reading: > > 'Information', 'Files' and 'Changelog'. >

Re: [Cooker] New rpmdrake

2003-01-14 Thread David Walser
Yes! Thanks for reminding him Chris. --- Chris Picton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I like the look of the new rpmdrake, but > > I feel that the radio buttons 'Normal information', > and 'Maximum > information' should be replaced with three notebook > tabs reading: > 'Information', 'Files' and 'C

[Cooker] New rpmdrake

2003-01-14 Thread Chris Picton
I like the look of the new rpmdrake, but I feel that the radio buttons 'Normal information', and 'Maximum information' should be replaced with three notebook tabs reading: 'Information', 'Files' and 'Changelog'. The relevant information should be placed in these tabs. Keep up the good work :) -

Re: [Cooker] new rpmdrake problems

2002-08-19 Thread Danny Tholen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Monday 19 August 2002 19:25, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote: > > > The URL should be copy/pastable text! > > This seems minor to me :-). I would have thought so as well, but actually I found that this would be very usefull when adding long http

Interface issues (Re: [Cooker] new rpmdrake problems)

2002-08-19 Thread Stephane Gourichon
On 19 Aug 2002, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote: > > [4] if the checkbox could be at the left of the name instead of the > > right, you'd see it even if the widest package name was wider than > > the sub-window listing packages. > > There are hardcoded sizes so that the box must never disappe

Re: [Cooker] new rpmdrake problems

2002-08-19 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau
Rghetta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Some things I really miss from old rpmdrake: > > - it was a single application: having to open multiple apps is a real pain. 1- start Mandrake Control Center 2- anyway I always didn't much understand why one would need to both install and uninstall pac

Re: [Cooker] new rpmdrake problems

2002-08-19 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau
"Liam R. E. Quin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > [1] When I started the new rpmdrake I got a message, > > Could not find /var/lib/urpmi/compssUsers.flat, > the installer should have generated it fo me :-( > > Disabling "Mandrake choices" classification. It should be definitively fixed with upco

Re: [Cooker] new rpmdrake problems

2002-08-19 Thread Han
Guillaume Cottenceau ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > It's now renamed to "by update availability" which is fairly better > than "by presence" (latest version). Updatable? Btw, I miss the changelog section very much. Although that is not a priority for now. :S Groetjes, Han. -- http:/

Re: [Cooker] new rpmdrake problems

2002-08-09 Thread Marcelo de Castro
Indeed, by all means the new RPMDRAKE is a true downgrade on the interface. On Friday 09 August 2002 06:47 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > And being able to "browse" to the local source was a great feature that > I sorely miss. It was also much easier in the "old days" because the app > f

Re: [Cooker] new rpmdrake problems

2002-08-09 Thread newslett
And being able to "browse" to the local source was a great feature that I sorely miss. It was also much easier in the "old days" because the app found the hdlist for you within the source if it was there, which was a nice feature. Please bring it back!! Adding/Editing sources is now a real pain.

Re: [Cooker] new rpmdrake problems

2002-08-09 Thread Todd Lyons
Rghetta wrote on Fri, Aug 09, 2002 at 12:17:31PM +0200 : > > Some things I really miss from old rpmdrake: > - it was a single application: having to open multiple apps is a real pain. Run 'drakconf' and access it from there. Blue skies... Todd -- Todd Lyons -- MandrakeSoft

Re: [Cooker] new rpmdrake problems

2002-08-09 Thread Aurélien Bompard
> - search by description This one was extremely useful for me, please add it back.

Re: [Cooker] new rpmdrake problems

2002-08-09 Thread Mark K. Bilbo
On Fri, 09 Aug 2002 12:17:31 +0200 Rghetta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Some things I really miss from old rpmdrake: > > - it was a single application: having to open multiple apps is a real > pain. > > - 'updates only' filter, the 'updated' icon and the curr. inst. > version > > - cha

Re: [Cooker] new rpmdrake problems

2002-08-09 Thread Antonin Chadima
Dne pá 9. srpen 2002 12:17 Rghetta napsal(a): > Some things I really miss from old rpmdrake: > > - it was a single application: having to open multiple apps is a real > pain. > > - 'updates only' filter, the 'updated' icon and the curr. inst. version > > - changelog and file list, I use them a

[Cooker] new rpmdrake problems

2002-08-09 Thread Rghetta
Some things I really miss from old rpmdrake: - it was a single application: having to open multiple apps is a real pain. - 'updates only' filter, the 'updated' icon and the curr. inst. version - changelog and file list, I use them a lot - search by description

Re: [Cooker] new rpmdrake (i know, i know... but please read)

2002-08-03 Thread Lonnie Borntreger
oh, btw. how do i read the updates for a certain day > made for that rpm release? > > > - Original Message - > From: Jason Marsh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2002 21:50:22 -0800 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Cooker] new rpmdrake (

Re: [Cooker] new rpmdrake (i know, i know... but please read)

2002-08-03 Thread Alex Perry
? - Original Message - From: Jason Marsh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2002 21:50:22 -0800 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Cooker] new rpmdrake (i know, i know... but please read) > On Friday 02 August 2002 1:14 pm, Alex Perry wrote: > > i used the old rpmdrake to

Re: [Cooker] new rpmdrake (i know, i know... but please read)

2002-08-02 Thread Jason Marsh
On Friday 02 August 2002 1:14 pm, Alex Perry wrote: > i used the old rpmdrake to update from the cooker > all the time. i'd update the list, and select > everything with that icon beside it. now, with the > new rpmdrake, what do i do? how do i install all the > updated packages off the cooker ftp?

[Cooker] new rpmdrake (i know, i know... but please read)

2002-08-02 Thread Alex Perry
i used the old rpmdrake to update from the cooker all the time. i'd update the list, and select everything with that icon beside it. now, with the new rpmdrake, what do i do? how do i install all the updated packages off the cooker ftp? -- Get your free email from www.linuxmail.org Powere

Re: [Cooker] new rpmdrake gets the busy cursor bug

2002-08-02 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau
Adam Williamson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > fixes it. Can rpmdrake author please apply the fix that harddrake uses? Fixed in CVS, I'll upload a new package today. -- Guillaume Cottenceau - http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/

[Cooker] new rpmdrake gets the busy cursor bug

2002-08-01 Thread Adam Williamson
Well, just like bubbles in the wallpaper, as soon as the busy cursor bug is splatted in one package (harddrake2 - thanks for the fix!) it pops up somewhere else; the new rpmdrake has inherited this bug :). Just like harddrake used to, when I run rpmdrake my cursor turns into the busy cursor foreve

Re: [Cooker] new rpmdrake suggestion

2002-06-09 Thread JJ
Ben Reser wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 05, 2002 at 04:12:50AM -0700, David Walser wrote: > > Please bring MandrakeUpdate back as a seperate tool, > > that way people can still easily get their security > > updates even when rpmdrake is broken (like in 8.1). > > Unless the new rpmdrake is going to be re

Re: [Cooker] new rpmdrake suggestion

2002-06-08 Thread Ben Reser
On Wed, Jun 05, 2002 at 04:12:50AM -0700, David Walser wrote: > Please bring MandrakeUpdate back as a seperate tool, > that way people can still easily get their security > updates even when rpmdrake is broken (like in 8.1). > Unless the new rpmdrake is going to be real > streamlined, simple, and

Re: [Cooker] new rpmdrake suggestion

2002-06-05 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau
David Walser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Please bring MandrakeUpdate back as a seperate tool, > that way people can still easily get their security > updates even when rpmdrake is broken (like in 8.1). > Unless the new rpmdrake is going to be real > streamlined, simple, and impossible to get wr

Re: [Cooker] new rpmdrake suggestion

2002-06-05 Thread pascal
Le Mercredi 5 Juin 2002 13:12, David Walser a écrit : > Please bring MandrakeUpdate back as a seperate tool, > that way people can still easily get their security > updates even when rpmdrake is broken (like in 8.1). > Unless the new rpmdrake is going to be real > streamlined, simple, and impossib

[Cooker] new rpmdrake suggestion

2002-06-05 Thread David Walser
Please bring MandrakeUpdate back as a seperate tool, that way people can still easily get their security updates even when rpmdrake is broken (like in 8.1). Unless the new rpmdrake is going to be real streamlined, simple, and impossible to get wrong (aka nothing like the current one), I think it'

Re: [Cooker] new rpmdrake to test

2001-07-13 Thread Thierry Vignaud
Blue Lizard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Obviously the code for new features is gonna be in debug mode for a > > > little while (ie, not aimed at efficiency) but would you care for us to > > > break with the 'only fix what you're gonna ship' policy and do some > > > profiling or other perf d

Re: [Cooker] new rpmdrake to test

2001-07-12 Thread David Walluck
72mdk and 73mdk both work for me, except that the progress indications seem to be broken (see my previous e-mail about what I think of the 'Invoking rpminst' and other progress indicators in MandrakeUpdate). However, this was only after my rpm database mysteriously corrupted itself (for the 99

Re: [Cooker] new rpmdrake to test

2001-07-12 Thread Peter Polman
On Thursday 12 July 2001 09:04, you wrote: > Hi, > > I've been told that I should communicate more on rpmdrake/mandrakeuupdate > aka "Software Manager", so I do. > > I've just uploaded a new release of rpmdrake (1.3-73mdk), which should fix > the "rpmdrake does nothing" bug. I.e. packages ar

Re: [Cooker] new rpmdrake to test

2001-07-12 Thread Mike Graham
Marcel Pol wrote: > On Thu, 12 Jul 2001 17:04:59 +0200 > David Odin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> I've been told that I should communicate more on >> > rpmdrake/mandrakeuupdate > >>aka "Software Manager", so I do. >> >> I've just uploaded a new release of rpmdrake (1.3-73mdk), which >> > s

Re: [Cooker] new rpmdrake to test

2001-07-12 Thread Blue Lizard
On 12 Jul 2001 22:00:30 +0200, Thierry Vignaud wrote: > Blue Lizard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > P.S: "this feature is slow" isn't a bug report ;-) > > > > Obviously the code for new features is gonna be in debug mode for a > > little while (ie, not aimed at efficiency) but would you care

Re: [Cooker] new rpmdrake to test

2001-07-12 Thread Blue Lizard
> P.S: "this feature is slow" isn't a bug report ;-) > Obviously the code for new features is gonna be in debug mode for a little while (ie, not aimed at efficiency) but would you care for us to break with the 'only fix what you're gonna ship' policy and do some profiling or other perf drudgery

Re: [Cooker] new rpmdrake to test

2001-07-12 Thread Marcel Pol
On Thu, 12 Jul 2001 17:04:59 +0200 David Odin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've been told that I should communicate more on rpmdrake/mandrakeuupdate > aka "Software Manager", so I do. > > I've just uploaded a new release of rpmdrake (1.3-73mdk), which should fix > the "rpmdrake does nothing" b

Re: [Cooker] new rpmdrake to test

2001-07-12 Thread David Walluck
Marcel Pol wrote: > On Thu, 12 Jul 2001 17:04:59 +0200 > David Odin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I am still waiting for rhis thing to hit the mirrors. Also, some packages from yesterday are not there yet, so it looks like I may have a while to wait. While we're waiting how about a feature requ

Re: [Cooker] new rpmdrake to test

2001-07-12 Thread Marcel Pol
On Thu, 12 Jul 2001 18:30:57 +0200 David Odin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Jul 12, 2001 at 05:59:45PM +0200, Marcel Pol wrote: > > On Thu, 12 Jul 2001 17:04:59 +0200 > > David Odin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > I've just uploaded a new release of rpmdrake (1.3-73mdk), which > > s

Re: [Cooker] new rpmdrake to test

2001-07-12 Thread David Odin
On Thu, Jul 12, 2001 at 05:59:45PM +0200, Marcel Pol wrote: > On Thu, 12 Jul 2001 17:04:59 +0200 > David Odin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I've just uploaded a new release of rpmdrake (1.3-73mdk), which > should fix > > the "rpmdrake does nothing" bug. I.e. packages are now correctly > insta

Re: [Cooker] new rpmdrake to test

2001-07-12 Thread David Odin
On Thu, Jul 12, 2001 at 06:01:55PM -0400, Guillaume Rousse wrote: > Ainsi parlait David Odin : > > P.S: "this feature is slow" isn't a bug report ;-) > Do you prefer "this feature doesn't work :-) ?" > Sometimes, yes! I was refering to the "search by file" and "search by description" new fea

Re: [Cooker] new rpmdrake to test

2001-07-12 Thread Marcel Pol
On Thu, 12 Jul 2001 17:04:59 +0200 David Odin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've just uploaded a new release of rpmdrake (1.3-73mdk), which should fix > the "rpmdrake does nothing" bug. I.e. packages are now correctly installed. > At least it works on my freshly installed cooker. It works here t

Re: [Cooker] new rpmdrake to test

2001-07-12 Thread Guillaume Rousse
Ainsi parlait David Odin : > P.S: "this feature is slow" isn't a bug report ;-) Do you prefer "this feature doesn't work :-) ?" -- Guillaume Rousse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> GPG key http://bohm.snv.jussieu.fr/~rousse/gpgkey.html

[Cooker] new rpmdrake to test

2001-07-12 Thread David Odin
Hi, I've been told that I should communicate more on rpmdrake/mandrakeuupdate aka "Software Manager", so I do. I've just uploaded a new release of rpmdrake (1.3-73mdk), which should fix the "rpmdrake does nothing" bug. I.e. packages are now correctly installed. At least it works on my fre