Re: [Cooker] Re: [Bug 1148] [ggv] ggv pdf rendering under gnome 2.2 looks terrible

2003-07-29 Thread andre
On Wednesday 16 July 2003 20:03, Abel Cheung wrote: > On 2003-07-16(Wed) 19:50:24 +0200, Olivier Blin wrote: > > > Anyway, pdf displaying ability is OFFICIALLY not supported, and can > > > be removed anytime. So don't put expection to it in the future. :-/ > > > > ok, thanks for your explanations :

Re: [Cooker] Re: [Bug 1148] [ggv] ggv pdf rendering under gnome 2.2 looks terrible

2003-07-16 Thread Abel Cheung
On 2003-07-16(Wed) 19:50:24 +0200, Olivier Blin wrote: > > Anyway, pdf displaying ability is OFFICIALLY not supported, and can > > be removed anytime. So don't put expection to it in the future. :-/ > > ok, thanks for your explanations :) > But I can't imagine why it would be removed, ggv uses gs

Re: [Cooker] Re: [Bug 1148] [ggv] ggv pdf rendering under gnome 2.2 looks terrible

2003-07-16 Thread Abel Cheung
On 2003-07-16(Wed) 18:20:42 +0200, Olivier Blin wrote: > > http://linuxtoday.com/developer/2003071600926NWGNRL > > "it's not what the new release brings, but what it doesn't anymore: GGV no longer > registers as a viewer for PDF files, leaving this role to GPdf." > > I understand this sentence a

[Cooker] Re: [Bug 1148] [ggv] ggv pdf rendering under gnome 2.2 looks terrible

2003-07-16 Thread David Walser
Olivier Blin wrote: >> No more, maintainer is officially removing pdf support from ggv. >> It has been decided quite some time ago. You're quoting outdated >> info. > > So, where can I get up to date info about ggv ? :-) > Even the current GGV user manual says that GGV supports PDF rendering. htt