Re: Re: [Cooker] new glibc cooker & contribs rebuild

2002-10-10 Thread Frederic Crozat
On Thu, 10 Oct 2002 12:11:48 +0200, Florent BERANGER wrote: > Le Mercredi 9 Octobre 2002 22:45, Florent BERANGER a écrit : >> Hello, >> >> when will be the massive rebuild with new glibc (2.3) ? >> >> Thanks, >> >> Florent > > up ;) > PS : and about lirc problem (lirc_serial driver) ?

Re: [Cooker] new glibc cooker & contribs rebuild

2002-10-10 Thread Florent BERANGER
Le Mercredi 9 Octobre 2002 22:45, Florent BERANGER a écrit : > Hello, > > when will be the massive rebuild with new glibc (2.3) ? > > Thanks, > > Florent up ;) PS : and about lirc problem (lirc_serial driver) ? -- EXCEPTIONNEL! Tiscali lance les forfaits Internet Illimités, à

Re: [Cooker] New GLIBC in update for 8.0, what's new?

2001-05-15 Thread Christian Zoffoli
Chmouel Boudjnah wrote: > > Jürgen Zimmermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > What's fixed in glibc-2.2.2-5mdk? > > > mainly for Oracle users.. > > > > But it did not resolve the problems with Oracle8i 8.1.7 (aka -R3) not > > starting > > on glibc-2.2 based systems. > > it use to works fo

Re: [Cooker] New GLIBC in update for 8.0, what's new?

2001-05-14 Thread Jürgen Zimmermann
> > What's fixed in glibc-2.2.2-5mdk? > mainly for Oracle users.. But it did not resolve the problems with Oracle8i 8.1.7 (aka -R3) not starting on glibc-2.2 based systems. Fix for this is available from Oracle (you have to register first): http://otn.oracle.com/software/products/oracle8i/files/

Re: [Cooker] New GLIBC in update for 8.0, what's new?

2001-05-14 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah
Jürgen Zimmermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > What's fixed in glibc-2.2.2-5mdk? > > mainly for Oracle users.. > > But it did not resolve the problems with Oracle8i 8.1.7 (aka -R3) not > starting > on glibc-2.2 based systems. it use to works for me :p, don't tell me to retest again.. > Fi

Re: [Cooker] New GLIBC in update for 8.0, what's new?

2001-05-14 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah
Claudio (sekko) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > What's fixed in glibc-2.2.2-5mdk? mainly for Oracle users..

Re: [Cooker] New GLIBC in update for 8.0, what's new?

2001-05-08 Thread Vincent Danen
On Tue May 08, 2001 at 09:20:08AM +0200, Claudio wrote: > What's fixed in glibc-2.2.2-5mdk? Read the advisory: http://www.linux-mandrake.com/en/security/2001/MDKA-2001-006.php3 -- [EMAIL PROTECTED], OpenPGP key available on www.keyserver.net 1024D/FE6F2AFD 88D8 0D23 8D4B 3407 5BD7 66F9 204

Re: [Cooker] new glibc in unsupported directory

2001-02-20 Thread David Hedbor
Guillaume Rousse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On 2001.02.14 13:03:36 +0400 David Hedbor wrote: > > Chmouel Boudjnah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > David Hedbor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > > > Thank you. I have one question though - why strip (any) libraries? > > The > > > > ni

Re: [Cooker] new glibc in unsupported directory

2001-02-20 Thread David Hedbor
Chmouel Boudjnah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > David Hedbor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Hmm, that's glibc 2.1.3. The problem I'm having is with cooker and > > glibc-2.2.1. I recompiled the libs myself (well, I used the RPM and > > grabbed the libs before the build was complete and build tr

Re: [Cooker] new glibc in unsupported directory

2001-02-14 Thread Guillaume Rousse
On 2001.02.14 13:03:36 +0400 David Hedbor wrote: > Chmouel Boudjnah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > David Hedbor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > Thank you. I have one question though - why strip (any) libraries? > The > > > nice thing with Linux is that your libraries have debug symbols

Re: [Cooker] new glibc in unsupported directory

2001-02-14 Thread David Hedbor
Chmouel Boudjnah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > David Hedbor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Thank you. I have one question though - why strip (any) libraries? The > > nice thing with Linux is that your libraries have debug symbols. If > > you debug a program, this usually helps a lot when the

Re: [Cooker] new glibc in unsupported directory

2001-02-14 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah
David Hedbor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hmm, that's glibc 2.1.3. The problem I'm having is with cooker and > glibc-2.2.1. I recompiled the libs myself (well, I used the RPM and > grabbed the libs before the build was complete and build tree removed). which libs ? normally it should since ther

Re: [Cooker] new glibc in unsupported directory

2001-02-14 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah
David Hedbor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Thank you. I have one question though - why strip (any) libraries? The > nice thing with Linux is that your libraries have debug symbols. If > you debug a program, this usually helps a lot when the bug is > triggered somewhere in system or third party li

Re: [Cooker] new glibc in unsupported directory

2001-02-13 Thread David Hedbor
Chmouel Boudjnah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi, > > Just FYI i let you know that there is a new glibc rpm in unsupported > directory with no STRIPPING librarry which make works gdb. > > one of the unsupported mirors can be found here : > > ftp://ftp.sunet.se/pub/Linux/distributions/mandrak

Re: [Cooker] new glibc in unsupported directory

2001-02-13 Thread David Hedbor
Chmouel Boudjnah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi, > > Just FYI i let you know that there is a new glibc rpm in unsupported > directory with no STRIPPING librarry which make works gdb. > > one of the unsupported mirors can be found here : > > ftp://ftp.sunet.se/pub/Linux/distributions/mandrak

RE: [Cooker] new glibc

2000-07-07 Thread Geoffrey Lee
in the export restrictions we can now provide the crappy code in the glibc sources. Do not use an old add-on. This is a first test release and not much testing in complete systems and for compatibility has been done so far (this is why we are doing public release). This release is mainly mea

Re: [Cooker] new glibc

2000-07-07 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah
"Geoffrey Lee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > Geoffrey Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > Yo, > > > > > > hte new glibc has been released for some time now. > > > coudl e have that in cooker? > > > > not yet too much unstable (yes cooker is unstable also but we need a > > stable b

RE: [Cooker] new glibc

2000-07-06 Thread Geoffrey Lee
the awesome > work... and if > i do find something weird ill email about it, as long as the bug > dosent kill my > PPP or something like that > > Is this new glibc the 2.1.3 version your talking about or later? > this one taken from ftp://sourceware.cygnus.com/pub/glibc/releases glibc-2

RE: [Cooker] new glibc

2000-07-06 Thread Armisis Aieoln
Just a note on stability, I get and install the latest cooker weekly, (or more), just cause I love alpha/beta testing. So far cooker is more stable than i have ever seen any windoez anything keep up the awesome work... and if i do find something weird ill email about it, as long as the bug dosent

RE: [Cooker] new glibc

2000-07-06 Thread Geoffrey Lee
> > Geoffrey Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Yo, > > > > hte new glibc has been released for some time now. > > coudl e have that in cooker? > > not yet too much unstable (yes cooker is unstable also but we need a > stable base...). > but i thought that the new glibc was classified

Re: [Cooker] new glibc

2000-07-06 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah
Geoffrey Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Yo, > > hte new glibc has been released for some time now. > coudl e have that in cooker? not yet too much unstable (yes cooker is unstable also but we need a stable base...). -- MandrakeSoft Inchttp://www.mandrakesoft.com San-Francis