On Fri, 6 May 2022 16:59:16 GMT, Lance Andersen wrote:
>> Stuart Marks has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Add some assertions for entrySet.equals and keySet.equals
>
> I think you have done a nice job on the coverage.
>
> I
On Wed, 4 May 2022 19:16:14 GMT, Stuart Marks wrote:
>> Basic but fairly comprehensive set of tests for `IdentityHashMap`. The patch
>> in the bug report that breaks `IdentityHashMap` now causes several cases in
>> this new test to fail. There's more that could be done, but the new tests
>> co
On Fri, 6 May 2022 06:39:59 GMT, XenoAmess wrote:
> > It would be nice if such a test could be written, but as it stands I think
> > that `Wrappers.java` test is too simplistic.
>
> Would adding `Wrappers.java` a method-name white-list mechanism suitable in
> this situation?
It should really
On Thu, 5 May 2022 23:46:24 GMT, Stuart Marks wrote:
> It would be nice if such a test could be written, but as it stands I think
> that `Wrappers.java` test is too simplistic.
Would adding `Wrappers.java` a method-name white-list mechanism suitable in
this situation?
-
PR: https
On Wed, 4 May 2022 19:16:14 GMT, Stuart Marks wrote:
>> Basic but fairly comprehensive set of tests for `IdentityHashMap`. The patch
>> in the bug report that breaks `IdentityHashMap` now causes several cases in
>> this new test to fail. There's more that could be done, but the new tests
>> co
On Wed, 4 May 2022 19:16:14 GMT, Stuart Marks wrote:
>> Basic but fairly comprehensive set of tests for `IdentityHashMap`. The patch
>> in the bug report that breaks `IdentityHashMap` now causes several cases in
>> this new test to fail. There's more that could be done, but the new tests
>> co
On Wed, 4 May 2022 19:16:14 GMT, Stuart Marks wrote:
>> Basic but fairly comprehensive set of tests for `IdentityHashMap`. The patch
>> in the bug report that breaks `IdentityHashMap` now causes several cases in
>> this new test to fail. There's more that could be done, but the new tests
>> co
On Wed, 4 May 2022 19:16:14 GMT, Stuart Marks wrote:
>> Basic but fairly comprehensive set of tests for `IdentityHashMap`. The patch
>> in the bug report that breaks `IdentityHashMap` now causes several cases in
>> this new test to fail. There's more that could be done, but the new tests
>> co
> Basic but fairly comprehensive set of tests for `IdentityHashMap`. The patch
> in the bug report that breaks `IdentityHashMap` now causes several cases in
> this new test to fail. There's more that could be done, but the new tests
> cover most of the core functions of `IdentityHashMap`. Unfort
