On Wed, 31 Dec 2003 01:54 am, Eric Livingston wrote:
> Here's what I get when I try to perform an "update world" operation. I get
> other versions of the same thing if I try --deep and other options (meaning
> other packages besides baselayout crap out with the same message).
> ...
Heh... wrong li
Jon Nelson wrote:
(I suppose you could use spamc, it's faster, but also kinda scary).
Why is it scary?
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials.
Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's
Fre
Here's what I get when I try to perform an "update world" operation. I get
other versions of the same thing if I try --deep and other options (meaning
other packages besides baselayout crap out with the same message).
For some reason, it seems my portage ebuilds are masked? I originally got this
Roland writes:
--On Dienstag, 30. Dezember 2003 08:50 -0600 Joe Laffey
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I don't think we ever came to a resolution for the best way to discrad
spam from a .mailfilter. People tried delivering to /dev/null, etc.
Delivery to /bin/true should work just fine, or if you dont w
Hi,
Sorry If my English is bad...
I'm trying to configure 0.44.2 version in a solaris 9 box with
openssl 0.9.7c, openldap 2.1.25 and BerkeleyDB 4.2.
When the configure process arrive to webmail check, the process
stop it.
This is part of webmail/config.log ->
[...]
configure:5862: $?
Hi all,
I'm new at using courier. I installed it in a Debian Sarge box. Despite
I have it working (courier-imapd-ssl and courier-mta), I could not find
good setup guide in the web page (http://www.courier-mta.org/), nor
how to use the .courier files in $HOME dirs, nor how to make it now
conve
On Tue, 30 Dec 2003, Jon Nelson wrote:
> Well, then I'm at a loss, although the spam checking seems overly
> complicated. What's with the \* ?
the \* stuff is to check the SpamLevel added by SA. If it is over a
certain amount I reject it. Then if it is 1-3 *s I save it to be reviewed
later and f
Well, then I'm at a loss, although the spam checking seems overly
complicated. What's with the \* ?
Also "cc foo" then EXITCODE ... shouldn't that just be "to foo" ?
What are the contents of the DSN that you receive?
--
Ensign Walnut approaches Dr. Crusher with caution...
Jon Nelson <[EMAIL PR
On Tue, 30 Dec 2003, Jon Nelson wrote:
> You are problably running spamassasin incorrectly.
> How are you running it in .mailfilters *exactly*?
> You need to use it like this:
>
> exception {
> xfilter "/usr/bin/spamassassin --local"
> }
>
> (I suppose you could use spamc, it's faster, but also
You are problably running spamassasin incorrectly.
How are you running it in .mailfilters *exactly*?
You need to use it like this:
exception {
xfilter "/usr/bin/spamassassin --local"
}
(I suppose you could use spamc, it's faster, but also kinda scary).
On Tue, 30 Dec 2003, Joe Laffey wrote:
Joe Laffey wrote:
Any way to stop DSNs from messages spamassassin decides are spam?
Courier shouldn't be accepting messages to users that don't exist. Why
are messages bouncing (and causing DSN's)?
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM L
On Tue, 30 Dec 2003, Jon Nelson wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Dec 2003, Joe Laffey wrote:
>
> > Any way to stop DSNs from messages spamassassin decides are spam?
>
> Er, how are you using spamassassin? How are DSNs and spamassassin
> connected?
>
Calling SA from .mailfilter per user. I am still seeing DSN
On Tue, 30 Dec 2003, Joe Laffey wrote:
> Any way to stop DSNs from messages spamassassin decides are spam?
Er, how are you using spamassassin? How are DSNs and spamassassin
connected?
--
Ensign Walnut approaches Dr. Crusher with caution...
Jon Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
C and Python Code Garde
Any way to stop DSNs from messages spamassassin decides are spam?
--
Joe Laffey | Want to convert subnet masks between different
LAFFEY Computer Imaging | notations, or figure the number of IPs in a block?
St. Louis, MO | Whatmask - It's FREE (GPL) - NEW Version 1.2!
USA
--On Dienstag, 30. Dezember 2003 08:50 -0600 Joe Laffey
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't think we ever came to a resolution for the best way to discrad
> spam from a .mailfilter. People tried delivering to /dev/null, etc.
Delivery to /bin/true should work just fine, or if you dont want to
spa
I don't think we ever came to a resolution for the best way to discrad
spam from a .mailfilter. People tried delivering to /dev/null, etc.
I wondered if Sam had any comments on how to do this? I am now in a
position where I need to discard spam marked above a certain threshold.
I can deliver it t
16 matches
Mail list logo