Ravi wrote:
On Wednesday 14 October 2009 21:59:42 troy d. straszheim wrote:
def("plus", as(arg1 + arg2));
This is very cool and pretty intuitive. My main concern is that one needs to
build up the function type in generic code (as opposed to mpl vectors), but we
do have function_types to
On Wednesday 14 October 2009 21:59:42 troy d. straszheim wrote:
> boost::function still works, and doesn't require as<>:
>
>boost::function myplus = std::plus();
>def("myplus", myplus);
>
> and old-school function objects:
>
>def("otherplus", std::plus())
>
> I was surprised to find
On Friday 23 October 2009 04:38:30 Michele De Stefano wrote:
> typedef struct _p_Mat* Mat;
Creating a converter to/from a raw pointer is rather tricky (due to the way
argument type deduction handles pointers & references seamlessly, IIUC). You
should either expose _p_Mat or wrap the ra
Use class_.staticmethod(...) as shown below:
On Friday 30 October 2009 17:47:45 James Amundson wrote:
> BOOST_PYTHON_MODULE(foo)
> {
> class_("Foo",init<>())
> .def("doit", &Foo::doit)
.staticmethod( "doit" )
> .def("nonstatic_doit", &Foo::nonstatic_doit)
> ;
> }
Reg
Hi,
I have the following code:
---
#include
#include
class Foo
{
public:
Foo() {} ;
static void doit(const char * message) {
std::cout << "doing it statically: " << message << "\n";
};
void non
