On 02/11/2012 04:15 PM, Paul-Cristian Manta wrote:
I don't think it's impossible to set a metaclass of another class with
Boost.Python. The trick is actually pretty similar to the one above.
>>> class Foo:
...pass
...
>>> Foo = FooMeta(Foo.__name__, Foo.__bases__, dict(Foo.__dict__))
You
>
>
> This is indeed a perfectly valid way to make a metaclass, and it should
> definitely work to do the same thing in C++ using the C API and/or
> Boost.Python.
>
> The trouble is using that metaclass as the type of a Boost.Python-wrapped
> C++ class...that's what I think is basically impossible.
On 10 Feb 2012 at 21:23, Jim Bosch wrote:
> > when I execute Boost.Python export statement in C it adds some records in
> > Boost.Python and Python interpreter. When C is unloaded from memory somehow
> > these records are not being cleaned up. By the time we get to clean this
> > records
> > C is
Jim Bosch wrote:
> On 02/06/2012 11:33 AM, Neal Becker wrote:
>> Will std::shared_ptr just work also?
>
> Just tried the experiment, albeit with slightly old versions.
>
> As of gcc 4.4 (with -std=gnu++0x) and Boost 1.47, it looks like
> Boost.Python doesn't even recognize std::shared_ptr as any
