On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 1:44 PM, Niall Douglas wrote:
> If by "Python side" you mean Boost.Python, then I agree: BPL has no
> support for GIL management at all, and it really ought to. This was
> one of the things that was discussed in the BPL v3 discussions on
> this list a few months ago.
>
>
He
On 03/14/2012 04:37 PM, James Amundson wrote:
I have a use case involving Boost Serialization and Boost Python. I have
a (mostly) C++ library wrapped with Python. The C++ code uses Boost
Serialization to periodically create checkpoints from which the user can
resume later. Getting the serializati
On 03/15/2012 09:22 AM, christophe jean-joseph wrote:
Hello
The situation is as follow.
I have a C++ code that I haven't written and that I barely can modified.
I am supposed to reflect this code in Python with boost.
In the code, I have something looking like this:
Class A_Base {
A_Base(){};
~
On 16 Mar 2012 at 12:57, Adam Preble wrote:
> Well the current design does have a problem, but I think it's more to do
> with the Python side than the sum of the whole thing.
If by "Python side" you mean Boost.Python, then I agree: BPL has no
support for GIL management at all, and it really ough
