W dniu 27.10.2010 17:30, Marek pisze:
http://docs.python.org/release/2.5.4/lib/typesseq.html
Yeah, Buffers (and especially API/C Buffer and MemoryView functions)
vere what i was looking for.
Thanks again!
http://docs.python.org/c-api/buffer.html?highlight=buffer#PyBuffer_FromMemory/
--
uld work?
BTW. Suppose I had char* txt = "some string";
How do i create boost::python::object() that would containt the whole
string? Passing *txt or txt into boost::python::object(*txt) didn't work.
--
regards
Marek Denis
___
Cplusplus-s
e in Python and you
wrote that the objects (A,B) need to be instantiated under Python...This
time it's more like bad Queue.Queue implementation, not boost.python (as
CallPolicies don't work).
Anyway, thank you for you help, I appreciate...
--
pozdrawiam
Marek
is for returning data members of wrapped classes and other
things that are owned by another existing wrapped object.
Good point, thanks!
--
regards
Marek Denis
___
Cplusplus-sig mailing list
Cplusplus-sig@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/cplusplus-sig
let you know when I find somthing out.
[1] http://marek.octogan.net/python/
Using raw pointers is enough in my case, shared_ptrs would be safer, as
different threads may delete object.
--
Marek Denis
___
Cplusplus-sig mailing list
Cplusplus-sig@python.org
rate on the
object that was created in C++ module. Instead, it just operates on the
copy.
You shouldn't need any extra compiler flags. Just use Boost.Python the
way described in the tutorial, and throw in some register_ptr_to_python
invocations - that should be all you need.
--
best
. Any code snippets,
suggestions?
BTW. What options shall I pass to g++ in order to use shared_ptr?
Thank you in advance,
--
best regards
Marek Denis
[ma...@octogan.net]
___
Cplusplus-sig mailing list
Cplusplus-sig@python.org
http://mail.python.o
later in code, when I invoke
other method, say (for tests now):
#v+
void Manager::test()
{
callback.attr("p")();
return;
}
#v-
I get the "segmentation fault".
I should admit, that the callback variable is inside the global instance
of the Manager object, none of the objects are
