In the below example I need to add a constructor A(). How to do that?
class A{
public:
A(int);
int getA();
private:
int a;
};
I have tried add_declaration_code and add_registration_code but it seems
that these will not work for
the case of contructor.
Does these work a
Is there any function available in pyplusplus to findout the dependencies of
some declaration from public part only?
I searched but I didn't find any such functionality
For example in below file (afile.h) if I find out dependency for class A it
should not give class C as it is in the private part
>how do I search for the constructor
>parent::child::A::A(parent::child::B const & arg0) [constructor]
>What arg_types should I provide ?
>I have tried with and without namespaces like
>cons = mb.constructors('A', arg_types=['parent::child::B const &'])
>cons = mb.constructors('A', arg_types=[
a.h
===
#ifndef _INEX_A__
#define _INEX_A__
#include "b.h"
namespace parent{
namespace child{
class A{
public:
A(int const &);
A(int, int);
A(B const &);
int getA(int);
};
};
};
#endif
b.h
===
#ifndef _INEX_B__
#define _INEX_B__
namespace parent{
namespace chi
>This is the reason why declaration "b" is unexposed. In this case,
>declarations "b" was declared in a header file, which was not "asked"
>to be exposed.
Thanks again Roman for your prompt response.
Actually my doubt was like pyplusplus exposes declaration from all included
file that are in cur
aration is unexposed, but there are other
> declarations, which refer to it. This could
> cause "no to_python converter found" run time error. Declarations:
> someClassA::someClassA(someClassB const & arg0)
> [constructor]
Thanks
Vishal Bayskar
--
View this message in con
>It seems, that py++ was wrong :-(. Can you specify gccxml version, OS
>and your compiler? Do you mind to submit a small test case that
>reproduce the problem?
gccxml:
gccxml-0.9
OS:
x86_64-redhat-linux
Compiler:
gcc version 4.1.2 20080704 (Red Hat 4.1.2-44)
You can use the code attached below
>Did you try to remove "noncopyable" from the generated code? If so
>what happened?
Thanks, yes it works when "noncopyable" is removed.
>If you think, that py++ wrong, you can always override its decision:
>mb = module_builder_t( ... )
>mb.class_(...).noncopyable = False
Thanks again it is he
>I suspect it would do so if you don't have a public copy
constructor defined available, even if you didn't use boost::noncopyable
to get rid of it.
Thanks Jim,
I have defined public copy constructor explicitly now it is working.
___
Cplusplus-sig
>I didn't see anything attached to your email, and my tar doesn't like
>what's at the link above. I'm not sure whatever binding generator
>you're using (Py++?) uses to determine whether to thrown noncopyable in,
>there, but I suspect it would do so if you don't have a public copy
>constructo
I am facing a problem while creating python binding for some code in my
application.
I have created a sample program for that and attached the same to this mail.
Here after the generation of python bindings when I try to use that it fails
with error
No to_python (by-value) converter found for C+
>Roman can you tell me how could I get pyplusplus version 1.1. I have tried
using "svn co" but the >latest version that is checking out it only 1.0.0
>I tried with below cvs command
>svn co https://pygccxml.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/pygccxml pygccxml
>and
>svn co http://pygccxml.svn.sourceforg
I don't understand why do you struggle. The "exposed via an indexing
suite" method allows you to modify and iterate over the list using the
well defined and documented protocol. If you need to use:
Thanks Roman, Now I am able to use the functionality of list (although not
all like pop() but I use
Actually I need to extract the item present in the list, so I am trying to
use methonds of list (just for an example I tried push_back in the below
example).
vishal bayskar wrote:
>
>>Both indexing suites provides interface very similar to Python
>>containers. So the user w
>Both indexing suites provides interface very similar to Python
>containers. So the user will not have to learn new API, but if you
>insists, you can rename/introduce new method from Python
>AList.push_back = AList.append
But object Alist is not treated as a list and giving the below error.
>>>
>There is no need to expose std containers directly. Instead, expose
>declarations that are using them and Py++ will do the rest.
>mb.free_function( 'getDummyAlist' ).include()
>This topic is covered in the following document:
>http://language-binding.net/pyplusplus/documentation/containers.html
Actually I am able create wrapper code for list . All the functions of list
are exposed.
But when I try to compile it (try to create shared library) it showing below
error
---
testModule.cpp:11: error: _Alloc was not declared in this scope
testModule.cpp:18: error: _Tp was not declared in
>http://language-binding.net/_downloads/smart_ptrs.zip contains a
>working example. You can download it and study.
Thanks Roman for your guidance, I have studied the example and also
succesfully used it in python script.
My next doubt is how did you generate the binding.cpp, becouse I also tried
>You should not export export "SmartPtr" class as is. You can "teach"
>Boost.Python to understand that an object is the instance of SmartPtr
>class and it will handle for you and your users "operator*" and
>"operator->".
>The following example (
>http://language-binding.net/pyplusplus/troublesho
Hi I have a requirement of using dereferencing pointer, like in the below
code
checkSmartPtr.h
#include
#include"test.h"
using namespace std;
template
class SmartPtr
{
public:
SmartPtr(T *ptr):pointee(ptr)
{
}
T *operator->()
{
Hi,
Actually I am generating a python binding for my source code, in which there
were a extensive use of operator like operator++(), "operator*",
"operator->".
As python does not support for these operators. and pyplusplus is failing to
generate wrapper code for these operator. Are there any wor
21 matches
Mail list logo
