Thanks Dave,
not quite sure of it, but it looks like you added the unit tests to the
Jamfile, but you did not add the tests source code to the svn, did I
miss something.
Also, the tests i submitted do not consider the compiler brand/version,
so they may fail on compilers that do not have the
At Mon, 25 Jan 2010 10:47:06 +0100,
Nicolas Lelong wrote:
>
> Thanks Dave,
>
> not quite sure of it, but it looks like you added the unit tests to
> the Jamfile, but you did not add the tests source code to the svn,
> did I miss something.
Gah, I hate SVN.
> Also, the tests i submitted do not c
On Fri, 2010-01-22 at 17:29 -0800, lin yun wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to install boost 1.41 on Redhat Enterprise Linux 5.3 and I
> got problem with the extension test. Following the instructions here:
> http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_41_0/libs/python/doc/building.html
> * I built boost
Hi, Jim:
Thank you very much for your reply !
I did not mention that I had no problem with Boost 1.34, on the same system.
Also I ever tried Boost 1.34 and 1.37 on Fedora 7, I got exactly the same
result: Boost 1.34 worked fine while 1.37 failed on extension test. The test
I ran was the example t
On Mon, 2010-01-25 at 12:38 -0800, lin yun wrote:
> I did not mention that I had no problem with Boost 1.34, on the same
> system. Also I ever tried Boost 1.34 and 1.37 on Fedora 7, I got
> exactly the same result: Boost 1.34 worked fine while 1.37 failed on
> extension test. The test I ran was th
