Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED] (from Sun, 21 May 2006 14:48:37 -0700):
At Fri, 19 May 2006 14:31:16 +0200,
Alexander Leidinger wrote:
Quoting "George V. Neville-Neil" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (from Thu, 18
May 2006 10:14:26 -0700):
> I so hate to chime in on this thread, but I really think we need to
>
At Fri, 19 May 2006 14:31:16 +0200,
Alexander Leidinger wrote:
>
> Quoting "George V. Neville-Neil" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (from Thu, 18
> May 2006 10:14:26 -0700):
>
> > I so hate to chime in on this thread, but I really think we need to
> > start putting things into the code and using Doxygen, o
Quoting Sergey Babkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (from Fri, 19 May 2006
06:14:58 -0500 (CDT)):
Doxygen is definitely beffer than nothing but not a
replacement for proper man pages either. I've had
experience with this kind of documentation in Qt,
and it gives some idea of what is happening inside
the
Quoting "George V. Neville-Neil" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (from Thu, 18
May 2006 10:14:26 -0700):
I so hate to chime in on this thread, but I really think we need to
start putting things into the code and using Doxygen, or a moral
equivalent, to at least have a chance of keeping such things up to
d
>From: Warner Losh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Warner Losh writes:
>>
>> >> I've not been very impressed with what I've seen from sources using
>> >> this approach, but I guess having the prototypes with one line
>> >> comments is better than nothing.
>> >
>> >Doxygen d
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Warner Losh writes:
>
> >> I've not been very impressed with what I've seen from sources using
> >> this approach, but I guess having the prototypes with one line
> >> comments is better than nothing.
> >
> >Doxygen does more than one line, and you get out of it t
[Doxygen]
Once upon a time, Back In The Day(tm), I worked on a mainframe OS called
CP6. CP6 had a lot of cool attributes, but the one that is relevant
here is that we kept our entire API documentation (including multiple
levels of error messages) in the code itself. Every distinct type of
docume
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Warner Losh writes:
>> I've not been very impressed with what I've seen from sources using
>> this approach, but I guess having the prototypes with one line
>> comments is better than nothing.
>
>Doxygen does more than one line, and you get out of it the effort that
From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src Makefile.inc1 ObsoleteFiles.inc src/etc/defaults
rc.conf src/etc/mtree BSD.usr.dist src/etc/rc.d Makefile isdnd pcvt syscons
src/release/picobsd/build picobsd src/share/man/man4 Makefile atkbd.4 kbdmux.4
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "George V. Neville-Neil" write
s:
>At Thu, 18 May 2006 15:47:30 +0200,
>Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>> Part of the problem is that there will never be a "definitive kernel
>> API manual" for FreeBSD, it will always be in flux and therefore
>> drivers will need to be upd
At Thu, 18 May 2006 15:47:30 +0200,
Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> Part of the problem is that there will never be a "definitive kernel
> API manual" for FreeBSD, it will always be in flux and therefore
> drivers will need to be updated to keep abreast.
I so hate to chime in on this thread, but I real
On Wednesday 17 May 2006 22:12, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Julian Elischer writes:
>
> >I've seen people mention that they are running pcvt quite recently.
>
> Last three times I've tried on -current, a pcvt kernel didn't even
> boot.
With all respect for you and
Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
[...]
phk, you're a really good developer. As a product manager, you suck.
[...]
Can we move this ...uhm... discussion out of the public mailing list?
-Maxim
___
cvs-all@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/ma
[message tidied up]
On Wednesday, 17 May 2006 at 13:57:26 -0700, Julian Elischer wrote:
> Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>
>> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Julian Elischer writes:
>>> Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>>
>>> Since our users run -stable, not -current, that just means that
>>> the code was broke
Julian Elischer wrote:
> Since stable users will want to upgrade to 7.x i a year or so, then it
> makes sense that an RFC
> about deleting features should be posted to -stable, and you shouod wait
> long enough for anyone
> to reply before deleting it.
FreeBSD 6.x will be supported until at least
Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Julian Elischer writes:
Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
Since our users run -stable, not -current, that just means that the code
was broken by someone,
not that no-one is running it...
Gee Julian, I thought you had mastere
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Julian Elischer writes:
>Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>Since our users run -stable, not -current, that just means that the code
>was broken by someone,
>not that no-one is running it...
Gee Julian, I thought you had mastered the difference between stable
and current
Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Julian Elischer writes:
I've seen people mention that they are running pcvt quite recently.
Since our users run -stable, not -current, that just means that the code
was broken by someone,
not that no-one is running it...
I d
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Julian Elischer writes:
>I've seen people mention that they are running pcvt quite recently.
Last three times I've tried on -current, a pcvt kernel didn't even
boot.
--
Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | TCP/IP since
Did I miss the discussion about this?
I've seen people mention that they are running pcvt quite recently.
Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
phk 2006-05-17 09:33:15 UTC
FreeBSD src repository
Modified files:
.Makefile.inc1 ObsoleteFiles.inc
etc/defaults rc
20 matches
Mail list logo
